1992
DOI: 10.1159/000150259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiation of Biologically Distinct Cucumber Mosaic Virus Isolates by PAGE of Double-Stranded RNA

Abstract: Electrophoresis on 5% polyacrylamide was used to analyze dsRNAs of 26 cucumber mosaic virus isolates propagated in Nicoîiana tabacum. There was variation between isolates in the migration of each of the dsRNAs 1,2, and 3. Comparison of the dsRNA profiles enabled each isolate to be allocated to 1 of 7 distinct dsRNA profile types. Two distinct and readily distinguishable isolates were mixed in planta and dsRNA from these infected plants compared with in vitro mixtures of them. All bands from both types were pre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
2
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The electrophoresis pattern of purified dsRNA was indistinguishable from RNAs 1, 2 and 3 of the recent isolates, and the differences in relation to the CMV isolates used as controls, were real and reproducible, as reported by other authors (Pares et al., 1992). The satRNA was only detected in the recent CMV isolates after the second passage by mechanical inoculation through NX plants, under greenhouse conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The electrophoresis pattern of purified dsRNA was indistinguishable from RNAs 1, 2 and 3 of the recent isolates, and the differences in relation to the CMV isolates used as controls, were real and reproducible, as reported by other authors (Pares et al., 1992). The satRNA was only detected in the recent CMV isolates after the second passage by mechanical inoculation through NX plants, under greenhouse conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…These CMV isolates could have been maintained as undetected haplotypes in mixed infection with prevalent haplotypes (Bonnet et al., 2005) or infecting until now alternative hosts as little focus of infection. This hypothesis seems to be opposite to the idea that a particular CMV type for a given host and geographical region appear to remain constant over time, as reported Pares et al. (1992) This could be specially true in this case, where a clear association of this particular CMV genotype with tomato plants has been demonstrated (Bonnet et al., 2005).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The groups are named in different ways based on the procedures used: DTL and ToRS, U and N, I and II, WT and S, etc. [4,[7][8][9][10] Studies on CMV strain variation have been done by serology [11,12], dsRNA analysis [13], PCR-RFLP [14,15] and microarray [16]. According to phylogenetic analyses based on nucleotide (nt) sequences of various parts of the CMV genome, the virus strains and isolates form three subgroups known as IA, TB and II [5,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%