Summary — It has recently been suggested that the low photosynthesis rates in tree species as compared to highly productive crops is at least partly due to resistances opposing the CO 2 fluxes in the mesophyll of tree leaves. To validate this assertion, values of CO 2 mole fractions in the chloroplasts of leaves from Quercus petraea, Q robur, Q ilex and Populus sp were estimated on the basis of the analysis of the partitioning of light driven electron flow between fractions used for the carboxylation or the oxygenation of RuBP by Rubisco. The procedure used included: i) a measure of total light driven electron flows derived from the chlorophyll a fluorescence ratio ΔF/F m ', which is proportional to the photochemical efficiency of PS II, multiplied by incident irradiance and a calibration coefficient; ii) an estimation of the electron flux devoted to carboxylation obtained from net CO 2 assimilation and respiration rate measurement, and using the known electron requirements (four electrons for CO 2 or O 2 fixation); iii) the derivation of the CO 2 mole fraction in the chloroplasts from the specificity factor of Rubisco, and the ratio of carboxylation/oxygenation of RuBP. Results showed that in the absence of drought stress, the mole fraction of CO 2 in the chloroplasts (35-45% of the atmospheric one) was much lower than the calculated substomatal one (60-70% of the atmospheric) in all species. Moreover, lowest values were * Correspondence and reprints: dreyer@nancy.inra.for Abbreviations: A: net CO 2 assimilation rate (μmol m -2 s -1 ); A 1% : net CO 2 assimilation under nonphotorespiratory (1% O 2 ) conditions; R d : nonphotorespiratory respiration (μmol m -2 s -1 ); g s+b : leaf conductance to CO 2 (mmol m -2 s -1 ); g s : stomatal conductance to CO 2 (mmol m -2 s -1 ); c a , c i , c c : mole fractions of CO 2 in the free atmosphere, in the substomatal spaces and in the chloroplast stroma, respectively (μmol mol -1 ); c cl and o cl : liquid phase concentrations of CO 2 and O 2 in the chloroplast stroma (μmol l -1 ); g m : mesophyll conductance to CO 2 (ie, from the substomatal spaces to the chloroplast stroma, mmol m -2 s -1 ); F m ' and F: maximal and steady-state fluorescence in the presence of actinic light; Φ II : photochemical efficiency of PS II; Φ e-: apparent quantum yield of light-driven electron flow; PFD: incident photosynthetic photon flux density (μmol m -2 s -1 ); J T : total light driven electron flow (μmol m -2 s -1 ); J C and J O : electron flows devoted to RuBP carboxylation and oxygenation, respectively (μmol m -2 s -1 ); S: specificity factor of Rubisco; α and α c : leaf absorptance in the PAR (adaxial surface) measured with an integrating sphere or computed from fluorescence data, respectively. recorded in the species with lowest assimilation rates, suggesting that the differences in the net CO 2 assimilation rate between species are linked to the CO 2 availability in the chloroplasts. Finally, the CO 2 availability decreased with increa...