Conflict, Interdependence, and Justice 2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-9994-8_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Difficulties Awakening the Sense of Injustice and Overcoming Oppression: On the Soporific Effects of System Justification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, in the early days of migrant settlement, host communities may show relatively less favorable attitudes toward newcomers. However, to the extent that people perceive something to be "system-sanctioned" (i.e., tied to core values of their sociopolitical system and/or part of the established status quo), system justification research demonstrates that they become more favorable toward it (Feygina, Jost, & Goldsmith, 2010;Gaucher & Jost, 2011). In other words, as the admittance of refugees becomes officially supported by the government and positively portrayed in mass media (i.e., system sanctioned), perceived threat is reduced and host community members' attitudes should become more favorable.…”
Section: The Role Of Perceived Threat and Competitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, in the early days of migrant settlement, host communities may show relatively less favorable attitudes toward newcomers. However, to the extent that people perceive something to be "system-sanctioned" (i.e., tied to core values of their sociopolitical system and/or part of the established status quo), system justification research demonstrates that they become more favorable toward it (Feygina, Jost, & Goldsmith, 2010;Gaucher & Jost, 2011). In other words, as the admittance of refugees becomes officially supported by the government and positively portrayed in mass media (i.e., system sanctioned), perceived threat is reduced and host community members' attitudes should become more favorable.…”
Section: The Role Of Perceived Threat and Competitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meritocratic ideology bolsters people to express the willingness to engage in unjust actions. According to system justification theory, system-justifying beliefs often endorse and bolster the intentions of endogenous unjust behaviors that maintain the status quo, such as favoring the current work situation, willingness to apply complementary stereotypes, supporting immigration policy, favoring power and achievement, expressing outgroup favoritism, and endorsing meritocratic ideologies (Gaucher & Jost, 2011;Gerber & Jackson, 2013;Jost, Blount, Pfeffer, & Hunyady, 2003;Jost & Hunyady, 2005;Kay, Jost, & Young, 2005;Rankin et al, 2009;Wakslak et al, 2007). In hierarchical and authoritative societies, people high in meritocratic ideology are more willing to sustain and conform to traditional hierarchical norms and legitimize privileged and even illegal behaviors that benefit the dominants, such as corruption.…”
Section: Effects Of Meritocratic Ideology On Corruptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence that presenting potential changes as "system-sanctioned" can increase support for such initiatives (see Gaucher & Jost, 2011). For instance, one study demonstrated that reframing proenvironmental initiatives as "preserving the American way of life" caused high system-justifiers to express stronger intentions to engage in environmentally sound behaviors and to sign more proenvironmental petitions (Feygina et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%