2014
DOI: 10.1364/ol.39.002338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffraction algorithm suitable for both near and far field with shifted destination window and oblique illumination

Abstract: We propose a method for diffraction simulation with both shifted destination window and a large oblique illumination. Based on the angular spectrum theory, we first derive a generalized transfer function (GTF) and a generalized point-spread function (GSPF) suitable for free-space diffraction simulation when both a shifted destination window and a large oblique illumination are taken into account. Then we analyze the sampling error caused by sampling of the GTF and the GSPF for numerical simulation based on fas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Properties of RS and AS methods have been investigated by many authors [5][6][7][8][9][10] concluding that AS and RS is accurate for shorter and longer propagation distances, respectively. A recent algorithm [11] was proposed for both short and long propagation distances, which selects either an AS or an RS solver for a given distance. In this work, we propose a novel scalar AS approach that minimizes the sampling requirements of diffraction calculations and allows extending the AS capability to larger propagation distances, i.e., z ≥ N Δ 2 λ −1 1 − λ 2 Δ −2 ∕4 1∕2 where N is number of samples, and Δ sample size.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Properties of RS and AS methods have been investigated by many authors [5][6][7][8][9][10] concluding that AS and RS is accurate for shorter and longer propagation distances, respectively. A recent algorithm [11] was proposed for both short and long propagation distances, which selects either an AS or an RS solver for a given distance. In this work, we propose a novel scalar AS approach that minimizes the sampling requirements of diffraction calculations and allows extending the AS capability to larger propagation distances, i.e., z ≥ N Δ 2 λ −1 1 − λ 2 Δ −2 ∕4 1∕2 where N is number of samples, and Δ sample size.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this rectangular space-frequency-shaped sampling strategy is very inefficient: high resolution and large distance propagations require a large SW with large empty space-frequency regions. This casts particular doubt on the utility of the RS method, as it is only accurate for large propagation distances [5,11].Several authors recognize the major downside of rigorous approaches that use the same sampling frequency of input and output fields. Harvey [13] proposed an AS approach for diffracted field calculation on a hemisphere.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a given bandwidth of the input wave field a given size of the sampling window and a given offset between the sampling windows, the propagation can only be done up to a certain distance limit without loss of accuracy. Detailed discussions on this limit for the angular spectrum and shifted angular spectrum method, which is also true for this modified method, can be found for example in [4][5][6]17]. To enable propagation for distances above the distance limit one has to choose another method for example [4][5][6].…”
Section: Discussion On the Sampling Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed discussions on this limit for the angular spectrum and shifted angular spectrum method, which is also true for this modified method, can be found for example in [4][5][6]17]. To enable propagation for distances above the distance limit one has to choose another method for example [4][5][6]. Or, one has to increase the size of the sampling window, which according to Eq.…”
Section: Discussion On the Sampling Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation