1997
DOI: 10.1107/s0021889896012812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffraction elastic constants of a cubic polycrystal

Abstract: New expressions for the diffraction elastic constants are presented for a cubic polycrystal that is statistically homogeneous, isotropic and disordered. The results are an extension of the theory of statistical continuum mechanics and differ from a previous derivation given by Bollenrath, Hauk, & Mfiller [Z Metallkde (1967), 58, 76-82].

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second approach has been developed as a tool for residual stress determination in deformed specimens after the external load is released. The macroscopic stress components are not known in this case; it is thus necessary to define a mesoscopic average stress field depending on the grain orientations, known as the stress orientation distribution function [25][26][27][28] . In this case, the proportionality factors between the strain and stress components are fully determined by the single-crystal elastic constants, although additional restrictive conditions or grain interaction models are often needed to obtain physically consistent solutions for the stress field.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second approach has been developed as a tool for residual stress determination in deformed specimens after the external load is released. The macroscopic stress components are not known in this case; it is thus necessary to define a mesoscopic average stress field depending on the grain orientations, known as the stress orientation distribution function [25][26][27][28] . In this case, the proportionality factors between the strain and stress components are fully determined by the single-crystal elastic constants, although additional restrictive conditions or grain interaction models are often needed to obtain physically consistent solutions for the stress field.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where a hkl,r is the lattice parameter containing stress effects (from Figure 3), and S1 hkl is the hkl-dependent X-ray elastic constant, determined by the same approximation discussed previously [9] and listed in Table II. The biaxial stress-corrected lattice parameters are shown in the lower part of Figure 5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of S2 420 was calculated to be 0.01374 GPa À1 using the approximation of DeWit [9] and the elastic constants for a Fe-18 wt pct Cr-12 wt pct Ni alloy reported by Bradfield [12] (c 11 = 215.9 GPa, c 12 = 144.6 GPa, and c 44 = 128.9 GPa). In Figure 4, for all four specimens, the a 420 results for w ‡ 30 deg fit well (Pearson correlation coefficient R > 0.993) to a straight line, but the results for w = 0 deg deviate from the fits.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the average stress and strain in each grain equals those of the surrounding homogeneous matrix. From the elastic stiffness, C ij , of a single crystal of pure Ni, the X-ray elastic constants were estimated using the Kröner model, which was extended by Wit [7]. The elastic stiffnesses of the single crystal used [8] are C 11 ¼ 250.8 GPa, C 12 ¼ 150.0 GPa, and C 44 ¼ 123.5 GPa.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%