Diffractive dijet production in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>¯</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math>collisions at<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msqrt><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msqrt><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.96</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>TeV</mml:mi></mml:math>

Aaltonen, T.; Albrow, M.; González, B. Álvarez; Amerio, S.; Amidei, D.; Anastassov, A.; Annovi, A.; Antos̆, J.; Apollinari, G.; Appel, J. A.; Arisawa, T.; Artikov, A.; Asaadi, J.; Ashmanskas, W.; Auerbach, B.; Aurisano, A.; Azfar, F.; Badgett, W.; Bae, T.; Barbaro-Galtieri, A.; Barnes, V. E.; Barnett, B. A.; Barria, P.; Bartoš, P.; Bauce, M.; Bedeschi, F.; Behari, S.; Bellettini, G.; Bellinger, J.; Benjamin, D.; Beretvas, A.; Bhatti, A.; Bisello, D.; Bizjak, I.; Bland, K. R.; Blumenfeld, B.; Bocci, A.; Bodek, A.; Bortoletto, D.; Boudreau, J.; Boveia, A.; Brigliadori, L.; Bromberg, C.; Brücken, E.; Budagov, J.; Budd, H. S.; Burkett, K.; Busetto, G.; Bussey, P.; Buzatu, A.; Calamba, A.; Calancha, C.; Camarda, S.; Campanelli, M.; Campbell, M.; Canelli, F.; Carls, B.; Carlsmith, D.; Carosi, R.; Carrillo, S.; Carron, S.; Casal, B.; Casarsa, M.; Castro, A.; Catastini, P.; Cauz, D.; Cavaliere, V.; Cavalli‐Sforza, M.; Cerri, A.; Cerrito, L.; Chen, Y. C.; Chertok, M.; Chiarelli, G.; Chlachidze, G.; Chlebana, F.; Cho, K.; Chokheli, D.; Chung, W. H.; Chung, Y. S.; Ciocci, M. A.; Clark, A.; Clarke, C.; Compostella, G.; Convery, M. E.; Conway, J.; Corbo, M.; Cordelli, M.; Cox, C. A.; Cox, D. J.; Crescioli, F.; Cuevas, J.; Culbertson, R.; Dagenhart, D.; D’Ascenzo, N.; Datta, M.; Barbaro, P. de; Dell’Orso, M.; Demortier, L.; Deninno, M.; Devoto, F.; D’Errico, M.; Canto, A. Di; Ruzza, B. Di; Dittmann, J.; D’Onofrio, M.; Donati, S.; Dong, P.; Dorigo, M.; Dorigo, T.; Ebina, K.; Elagin, A.; Eppig, A.; Erbacher, R.; Errede, S.; Ershaidat, N.; Eusebi, R.; Farrington, S. M.; Feindt, M.; Fernández, J. P.; Field, R. D.; Flanagan, G.; Forrest, R.; Frank, M.; Franklin, M.; Freeman, J.; Funakoshi, Y.; Furic, I. K.; Gallinaro, M.; Garcia, J. E.; Garfinkel, A. F.; Garosi, P.; Gerberich, H.; Gerchtein, E.; Giagu, S.; Giakoumopoulou, V.; Giannetti, P.; Gibson, K.; Ginsburg, C. M.; Giokaris, N.; Giromini, P.; Giurgiu, G.; Glagolev, V.; Glenzinskí, D.; Gold, M.; Goldin, D.; Goldschmidt, N.; Golossanov, A.; Gómez, G.; Gómez-Ceballos, G.; Goncharov, M.; González, O.; Gorelov, I.; Goshaw, A. T.; Goulianos, K.; Grinstein, S.; Grosso-Pilcher, C.; Costa, J. Guimarães da; Hahn, S. R.; Halkiadakis, E.; Hamaguchi, A.; Han, J.; Happacher, F.; Hara, K.; Hare, D.; Hare, M.; Harr, R.; Hatakeyama, K.; Hays, C. P.; Heck, M.; Heinrich, J.; Herndon, M.; Hewamanage, S.; Höcker, A.; Hopkins, W. H.; Horn, David; Hou, S.; Hughes, R.; Hurwitz, M.; Husemann, U.; Hussain, N.; Hussein, M.; Huston, J.; Introzzi, G.; Iori, M.; Ivanov, A.; James, E.; Jang, D.; Jayatilaka, B.; Jeon, E. J.; Jindariani, S.; Jones, M.; Joo, K. K.; Jun, S. Y.; Junk, T. R.; Kamon, T.; Karchin, P. E.; Kasmi, A.; Kato, Y.; Ketchum, W.; Keung, J.; Khotilovich, V.; Kilminster, B.; Kim, D. H.; Kim, H. S.; Kim, J. E.; Kim, M. J.; Kim, S. B.; Kim, S. H.; Kim, Y. K.; Kim, Y. J.; Kimura, N.; Kirby, M.; Klimenko, S.; Knoepfel, K. J.; Kondo, K.; Kong, D. J.; Königsberg, J.; Kotwal, A.; Kreps, M.; Kroll, J.; Krop, D.; Kruse, M.; Krutelyov, V.; Kuhr, T.; Kurata, M.; Kwang, S.; Laasanen, A. T.; Lami, S.; Lammel, S.; Lancaster, M.; Lander, R.; Lannon, K.; Lath, A.; Latino, G.; LeCompte, T.; Lee, E.; Lee, H. S.; Lee, J. S.; Lee, S. W.; Leo, S.; Leone, S.; Lewis, J. D.; Limosani, A.; Lin, C. J.; Lindgren, M.; Lipeles, E.; Lister, A.; Litvintsev, D. O.; Liu, C.; Liu, H.; Liu, Q.; Liu, T.; Lockwitz, S.; Loginov, A.; Lucchesi, D.; Lueck, J.; Lujan, P.; Lukens, P.; Lungu, G.; Lys, J.; Lysák, R.; Madrak, R.; Maeshima, K.; Maestro, P.; Malik, S.; Manca, G.; Manousakis-Katsikakis, A.; Margaroli, F.; Marino, C.; Martı́nez, M.; Mastrandrea, P.; Matera, K.; Mattson, M. E.; Mazzacane, A.; Mazzanti, P.; McFarland, K. S.; McIntyre, P.; McNulty, R.; Mehta, A.; Mehtälä, P.; Mesropian, C.; Miao, T.; Mietlicki, D.; Mitra, A.; Miyake, H.; Moêd, S.; Moggi, N.; Mondragón, M. N.; Moon, C. S.; Moore, R.; Morello, M. J.; Morlock, J.; Fernandez, P. Movilla; Mukherjee, A.; Müller, Th.; Murat, P.; Mussini, M.; Nachtman, J.; Nagai, Y.; Naganoma, J.; Nakano, I.; Napier, A.; Nett, J.; Neu, C.; Neubauer, M. S.; Nielsen, J.; Nodulman, L.; Noh, S. Y.; Norniella, O.; Oakes, L.; Oh, S. H.; Oh, Y. D.; Oksuzian, I.; Okusawa, T.; Orava, R.; Ortolan, L.; Griso, S. Pagan; Pagliarone, C.; Palencia, E.; Papadimitriou, V.; Paramonov, A.; Patrick, J.; Pauletta, G.; Paulini, M.; Paus, C.; Pellett, D.; Penzo, A.; Phillips, T. J.; Piacentino, G.; Pianori, E.; Pilot, J.; Pitts, K.; Plager, C.; Pondrom, L.; Poprocki, S.; Potamianos, K.; Prokoshin, F.; Pranko, A.; Ptohos, F.; Punzi, G.; Rahaman, A.; Ramakrishnan, V.; Ranjan, N.; Redondo, I.; Renton, P.; Rescigno, M.; Riddick, T.; Rimondi, F.; Ristori, L.; Robson, A.; Rodrigo, T.; Rodriguez, T.; Rogers, E.; Rolli, S.; Roser, R.; Ruffini, F.; Ruiz, A.; Russ, J.; Rusu, V.; Safonov, A.; Sakumoto, W. K.; Sakurai, Y.; Santi, L.; Sato, K.; Saveliev, V.; Savoy-Navarro, A.; Schlabach, P.; Schmidt, A.; Schmidt, E. E.; Schwarz, Thomas; Scodellaro, L.; Scribano, A.; Scuri, F.; Seidel, S. C.; Seiya, Y.; Semenov, A.; Sforza, F.; Shalhout, S.; Shears, T.; Shepard, P. F.; Shimojima, M.; Shochet, M. J.; Shreyber-Tecker, I.; Симоненко, А.; Sinervo, P.; Sliwa, K.; Smith, J. R.; Snider, F. D.; Soha, A.; Sorı́n, V.; Song, H.; Squillacioti, P.; Stancari, M.; Denis, R. St.; Stelzer, B.; Stelzer-Chilton, O.; Stentz, D.; Strologas, J.; Strycker, G. L.; Sudo, Y.; Суханов, А.; Суслов, И.; Takemasa, K.; Takeuchi, Y.; Tang, J.; Tecchio, M.; Teng, P. K.; Terashi, K.; Thom, J.; Thome, J.; Thompson, G. A.; Thomson, E.; Toback, D.; Tokár, S.; Tollefson, K.; Tomura, T.; Tonelli, D.; Torre, S.; Torretta, D.; Totaro, P.; Trovato, M.; Ukegawa, F.; Uozumi, S.; Varganov, A.; Vázquez, F.; Velev, G.; Vellidis, C.; Vidal, M.; Vila, I.; Vilar, R.; Vizán, J.; Vogel, M.; Volpi, G.; Wagner, P.; Wagner, R. L.; Wakisaka, T.; Wallny, R.; Wang, S. M.; Warburton, A.; Waters, D.; Wester, W. C.; Whiteson, D.; Wicklund, A. B.; Wicklund, E.; Wilbur, S.; Wick, F.; Williams, H. H.; Wilson, J. S.; Wilson, P.; Winer, B. L.; Wittich, P.; Wolbers, S.; Wolfe, H.; Wright, T.; Wu, X.; Wu, Z.; Yamamoto, K.; Yamato, D.; Yang, T.; Yang, U. K.; Yu, Yang; Yao, W-M.; Yeh, G. P.; Yi, K.; Yoh, J.; Yorita, K.; Yoshida, T.; Yu, G. B.; Yu, I.; Yu, S. S.; Yun, J. C.; Zanetti, A.; Zeng, Y.; Zhou, C.; Zucchelli, S.

doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.032009

Cited by 20 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This ansatz is consistent with the HERA ep data [7][8][9], but is known not to hold between the ep and the Tevatron (p" p) data [3][4][5][6], where an extra suppression (gap survival probability) factor is needed. In this analysis is approximated by the variables þ (system X going in the Àz direction) and À (system X going in the þz direction) defined at the level of stable particles as…”

Section: Kinematics and Cross Sectionssupporting

confidence: 64%

“…Because of this, PYTHIA8 (version 8.135) cannot be used to extract the rapidity gap survival probability. While the rapidity gap survival probability measured at the Tevatron [5,6] is close to that found in the present analysis, the two measurements cannot be directly compared because of the different kinematic regions they cover: 0:035 < < 0:095 for the CDF data and 0:0003 < < 0:002 for the present CMS data. This difference is TABLE II.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 67%

“…Diffraction with a hard scale has been studied in protonantiproton (p" p) and electron-proton (ep) collisions at CERN [2], Fermilab [3][4][5][6], and DESY [7][8][9][10]. Such hard diffractive processes can be described in terms of the convolution of diffractive parton distribution functions (dPDFs) and hard scattering cross sections, which are calculable in pQCD.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Observation of a diffractive contribution to dijet production in proton-proton collisions ats=7 TeV

Chatrchyan¹,

Khachatryan²,

Sirunyan³

et al. 2013

Phys. Rev. D

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The cross section for dijet production in proton-proton collisions at ffiffi ffi s p ¼ 7 TeV is presented as a function of, a variable that approximates the fractional momentum loss of the scattered proton in singlediffractive events. The analysis is based on an integrated luminosity of 2:7 nb À1 collected with the CMS detector at the LHC at low instantaneous luminosities, and uses events with jet transverse momentum of at least 20 GeV. The dijet cross section results are compared to the predictions of diffractive and nondiffractive models. The low-data show a significant contribution from diffractive dijet production, observed for the first time at the LHC. The associated rapidity gap survival probability is estimated.

show abstract

Section: Kinematics and Cross Sectionssupporting

confidence: 64%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 67%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Observation of a diffractive contribution to dijet production in proton-proton collisions ats=7 TeV

Chatrchyan¹,

Khachatryan²,

Sirunyan³

et al. 2013

Phys. Rev. D

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…SD dijet production with a leading antiproton. CDF measured this at three different energies, √ s = 630, 1800 and 1960 GeV [21,47,48]. Here not only the diffractive fractions were measured, but a number of differential distributions.…”

Section: Diffractive Dijets At the Tevatronmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hard diffraction with dynamic gap survival

Rasmussen

Sjöstrand

2016

J. High Energ. Phys.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We present a new framework for the modelling of hard diffraction in pp and pp collisions. It starts from the the approach pioneered by Ingelman and Schlein, wherein the single diffractive cross section is factorized into a Pomeron flux and a Pomeron PDF. To this it adds a dynamically calculated rapidity gap survival factor, derived from the modelling of multiparton interactions. This factor is not relevant for diffraction in ep collisions, giving non-universality between HERA and Tevatron diffractive event rates. The model has been implemented in Pythia 8 and provides a complete description of the hadronic state associated with any hard single diffractive process. Comparisons with pp and pp data reveal improvement in the description of single diffractive events.

show abstract

“…The CDF Run II experimental data [16] on SD dijet production are given, in particular, in terms of the SD-to-inclusive ratio R SD/incl , which is defined as follows…”

Section: Diffractive To Inclusive Ratiomentioning

confidence: 99%

Diffractive dijet production: Breakdown of factorization

Kopeliovich¹,

Pasechnik²,

Potashnikova³

2018

Phys. Rev. D

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We analyse the origin of dramatic breakdown of diffractive factorisation, observed in singlediffractive (SD) dijet production in hadronic collisions. One of the sources is the application of the results of measurements of the diagonal diffractive DIS to the off-diagonal hadronic diffractive process. The suppression caused by a possibility of inelastic interaction with the spectator partons is calculated at the amplitude level, differently from the usual probabilistic description. It turns out, however, that interaction with the spectator partons not only suppresses the SD cross section, but also gives rise to the main mechanism of SD dijet production, which is another important source of factorization failure. Our parameter-free calculations of SD-to-inclusive cross section ratio, performed in the dipole representation, agrees with the corresponding CDF Tevatron (Run II) data at √ s = 1.96 TeV in the relevant kinematic regions. The energy and hard scale dependences demonstrate a trend, opposite to the factorisation-based expectations, similarly to the effect observed earlier in diffractive Abelian radiation.

show abstract

Diffractive dijet production inp¯pcollisions ats=1.96 TeV

Cited by 20 publications

References 41 publications

Observation of a diffractive contribution to dijet production in proton-proton collisions ats=7 TeV

Observation of a diffractive contribution to dijet production in proton-proton collisions ats=7 TeV

Hard diffraction with dynamic gap survival

Diffractive dijet production: Breakdown of factorization

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About