2016
DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffractive Spectral-Splitting Optical Element Designed by Adjoint-Based Electromagnetic Optimization and Fabricated by Femtosecond 3D Direct Laser Writing

Abstract: The greatest source of loss in conventional single-junction photovoltaic cells is their inefficient utilization of the energy contained in the full spectrum of sunlight. To overcome this deficiency, we propose a multijunction system that laterally splits the solar spectrum onto a planar array of single-junction cells with different band gaps. As a first demonstration, we designed, fabricated, and characterized dispersive diffractive optics that spatially separated the visible (360–760 nm) and near-infrared (76… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This signifies that it is challenging to have perfect achromaticity and efficiency as phase-shift intercepts and slopes cannot be fully independently controlled in a planar design. The limitation confirms that this is intrinsically an optimization problem [32][33][34][35] . In metasurfaces, the spatial derivative of the slope controls the direction of incident rays to make them reach the focal point.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This signifies that it is challenging to have perfect achromaticity and efficiency as phase-shift intercepts and slopes cannot be fully independently controlled in a planar design. The limitation confirms that this is intrinsically an optimization problem [32][33][34][35] . In metasurfaces, the spatial derivative of the slope controls the direction of incident rays to make them reach the focal point.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This is in contrast to naïve approaches such as finite difference approximations which require N+1 simulations per gradient evaluation where N is the number of optimization parameters. The adjoint method has been applied to design many different devices as shown in Figure 10 including wavelength demultiplexers [254,255], polarization splitters [250], power splitters [251], photonic switches [256], nanophotonic resonators [257], and grating couplers [258]. Furthermore, thanks to the flexibility of the gradient-based optimization approach, arbitrary nonlinear objective functions with highly complex constraints can be handled, which has enabled incorporating fabrication [259] and robustness constraints at design time [256,260].…”
Section: Inverse Design To Advance Device Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Topology optimization is an alternative design method that can overcome the efficiency limitations of conventional approaches 11 . Inverse design methods, including objective-first and adjoint-based topology optimization 12 , have produced photonic crystals 13,14 , optical demultiplexers 15 , and spectral splitters 16 with outstanding performance resulting from the devices’ unusual geometries and nonintuitive optical dynamics. More recently, topology optimization has led to high-performance metasurfaces that have a broad range of capabilities, such as high-efficiency light deflection with nearly arbitrary input and output angles 17 , spectral sorting of plane waves to distinct diffraction orders 18 , and light focusing with field-curvature correction 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%