Diffractive trifocal pseudophakic intraocular lenses in high myopic eyes: 2-year assessment after implantation

Javaloy, Jaime; Rivera, Ester; Montalbán, Raúl; Beltrán, Jaime; Muñoz, Gonzalo; Rohrweck, Stephanie

doi:10.1007/s00417-019-04302-5

Cited by 18 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Concerning near vision, the mean monocular logMAR UNVA values were 0.07 ± 0.12 and 0.02 ± 0.05 and the binocular logMAR UNVA values were 0.02 ± 0.03 and 0.01 ± 0.04 in the RayOne IOL group and PanOptix IOL group, respectively. This is also consistent with the literature [2,4,14,15]. Although monocular/binocular distance and near VA appeared to be slightly better in the PanOptix IOL group at the third-month follow-up, they did not statistically signi cantly differ compared to the RayOne IOL group.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

“…In the RayOne and PanOptix IOL groups, the mean postoperative third-month monocular logMAR UDVA values were 0.07 ± 0.09 and 0.057 ± 0.06, respectively and the binocular logMAR UDVA values were 0.02 ± 0.04 and 0.01 ± 0.13, respectively. These results are similar to those previously reported for a variety of diffractive trifocal IOLs [2][3][4][5][6][7]14,15]. Concerning near vision, the mean monocular logMAR UNVA values were 0.07 ± 0.12 and 0.02 ± 0.05 and the binocular logMAR UNVA values were 0.02 ± 0.03 and 0.01 ± 0.04 in the RayOne IOL group and PanOptix IOL group, respectively.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

“…One of the main factors for dissatisfaction after monofocal pseudophakic eyes is lack of accommodation. Previous studies demonstrated that this problem could be resolved using diffractive trifocal IOLs [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Diffractive trifocal IOLs provide effective near, intermediate and distance visual restoration, and have been widely used in patients who want to achieve spectacle independence after surgery.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Comparison of Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Between two Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lenses

Yaprak¹,

Ünal²

2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose To evaluate the clinical outcomes and visual quality of patients undergoing cataract surgery with the implantation of two different models of diffractive trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs).MethodsThis randomized prospective comparative study included 60 eyes of 15 patients who scheduled to undergo bilateral cataract surgery with the implantation of two models of diffractive trifocal IOLs (RayOne Trifocal and AcrySof IQ PanOptix IOL). Monocular and binocular corrected and uncorrected distance visual acuity (CDVA, UDVA), intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA, UIVA) at 60 and 80 cm, near visual acuity (DCNVA, UNVA), and patient satisfaction were compared over a three-month follow-up.ResultsEach group comprised 30 eyes of 15 patients. No statistically significant differences were determined between the groups in terms of CDVA, UDVA, DCNVA and UNVA. The monocular and binocular UIVA values at 60 cm were better in the PanOptix IOL group (p=0.04 and p=0.01, respectively), and the DCIVA and UIVA values at 80 cm were better in the RayOne IOL group (p=0.01, p=0.047, p<0.001, and p=0.042, respectively). No statistically significant difference was found between the groups in relation to the frequency and severity of visual symptoms evaluated. Regarding discomfort, the RayOne IOL group had more bothersome halos and starbursts (p=0.026 and p=0.01, respectively).ConclusionBoth IOLs provided very good restoration of visual acuity. However, with the AcrySof IQ PanOptix IOL, the likelihood of patients experiencing bothersome halos and starbursts was less. The RayOne Trifocal IOL might be a better choice for patients who require further intermediate vision.The study was registered under the World Health Organization international clinical trials registry platform: NCT04655274, 30/11/2020, prospectively registered.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparison of Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Between two Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lenses

Yaprak¹,

Ünal²

2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Other published reports suggest that dysphotopsias experienced by some patients following surgery are important factors that could limit patient satisfaction [28][29][30]. Our study found that patients were very satisfied with their daytime distance vision (96.9% no / little difficulty in carrying out normal outdoor daytime activities even without glasses, 93.1% no / little difficulty for driving at daytime) but satisfaction with mesopic vision was reduced with 65.5% of the patients expressing little / no difficulty for driving at night without glasses.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Visual performance, safety and patient satisfaction after bilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens in presbyopic patients without cataract

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) for the correction of presbyopia and to assess patient satisfaction. Methods Records from three centres were reviewed to select presbyopic patients having undergone bilateral refractive lens exchange and implantation of the AT LISA tri 839MP multifocal IOL. Postoperatively, monocular and binocular distance, intermediate and near visual acuities, corrected and uncorrected, and subjective refraction were measured. Patients also completed a quality of life questionnaire. Safety evaluation included IOL stability and postoperative complications. Results 72 eyes (36 patients) were analysed. No clinically significant difference between pre- and postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was found for monocular or binocular measurements. Mean postoperative monocular CDVA was 0.02 ± 0.04 logMAR. Mean refractive values all improved statistically significantly compared with preoperative baseline (p ≤ 0.0064). Overall, 82.4% of eyes had spherical equivalent within ± 0.5 D and 97.1% within ± 1.0 D of emmetropia with a mean accuracy of -0.10 ± 0.41 D. Spectacle independence for distance, intermediate and near visual acuity was 87.5%, 84.4% and 78.1% respectively, and 78.1% of patients were satisfied with their postoperative, spectacle-free vision. Eight eyes received Nd:YAG laser treatment. No other IOL-related safety issues were reported. Conclusion AT LISA tri 839MP multifocal IOL bilaterally implanted in presbyopic patients provided excellent distance, intermediate and near visual outcomes with very accurate correction of refraction. These results were associated with a high level of spectacle independence and patient satisfaction. Trial registration Trial registered on https://clinicaltrials.gov/ under the identification NCT03790592 (31/12/2018).

show abstract

“…[10][11][12][13] The reason may be that patients with MIOLs have a higher demand for visual function, and the contrast sensitivity and visual quality of multifocal IOLs are lower than those of monofocal IOLs. In addition, Javaloy et al, 2019 reported that the Nd: YAG capsulotomy rate of Acri LISA tri 839M was 27.31% in the 2-year follow-up period, 14 Bilbao-Calabuig et al, 2016 reported the Nd:YAG capsulotomy rate after Acri LISA tri 839M implantation of 35% in 3 years. 15 In this study, the Nd:YAG capsulotomy rate of Acri LISA tri 839M was 22.5% and 34.17% respectively in the second and third years.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nd:YAG Capsulotomy Rates with Two Multifocal Intraocular Lenses

Bai¹,

Li²,

Zheng³

et al. 2021

IJGM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose:To investigate the incidence of Nd:YAG capsulotomy after implantation of two types of multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOLs). Methods: This retrospective analysis included patients who had undergone cataract extraction and implanted diffractive MIOL (Acri. LISA tri 839M) or asymmetric refractive MIOL (SBL-3) from May 2016 to September 2018. They were followed up for at least 3 years. During the followup period, the relevant data of patients were kept by special person in the hospital. The rates of Nd: YAG capsulotomy and the Kaplan-Meier survival curve were used to analyze the two groups. Results: The Asymmetric Refractive MIOL group was comprised of 98 patients (121 eyes), while the Diffractive MIOL group was comprised of 99 patients (120 eyes). There were no significant differences in age, sex, or IOL power between the two groups. The Nd:YAG rate of the asymmetric refractive MIOL group and the diffractive MIOL group was 3.3% and 7.5% respectively (P = 0.15) in the first year, 14.88% and 22.5% respectively (P = 0.129) in the second year, and 21.49% and 34.17% respectively (P = 0.028) in the third year. In the first 7 months of follow-up, the two groups showed the same performance in the Nd:YAG rate. After that, there was a difference between the two groups, and the difference gradually increased. Until the 27th month of follow-up, the difference was significant (P < 0.05). What is more, there were significant differences in survival (without Nd:YAG capsulotomy)/failure (with Nd:YAG capsulotomy) functions (P = 0.0035). Conclusion:The incidence of Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy in patients with diffractive MIOLs was higher than that in patients with asymmetric refractive MIOLs.

show abstract

Diffractive trifocal pseudophakic intraocular lenses in high myopic eyes: 2-year assessment after implantation

Cited by 18 publications

References 38 publications

Comparison of Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Between two Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lenses

Comparison of Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Between two Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lenses

Visual performance, safety and patient satisfaction after bilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens in presbyopic patients without cataract

Nd:YAG Capsulotomy Rates with Two Multifocal Intraocular Lenses

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About