2019 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/iccnc.2019.8685661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffuse Scattering Models for mmWave V2X Communications in Urban Scenarios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More precisely, in this study, the Directive model was used to assess the contribution of the DS. This choice was motivated by the fact that, when compared to the other DS models used in literature (i.e., Lambertian model), Vittorio degli Espositi et al, [33] demonstrated that the Directive model best follows the experimental measurement (also demonstrated by [34]). Specifically, the DS was applied to the building walls; as parameters were set the scattering factor "S" = 0.45, the crosspolarization fraction "K-pol" = 0.4, and the alpha value, i.e., the amplitude of the lobe scatterer ray, as 4 [33]- [36].…”
Section: Electric Field Calculation Through Raytracingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precisely, in this study, the Directive model was used to assess the contribution of the DS. This choice was motivated by the fact that, when compared to the other DS models used in literature (i.e., Lambertian model), Vittorio degli Espositi et al, [33] demonstrated that the Directive model best follows the experimental measurement (also demonstrated by [34]). Specifically, the DS was applied to the building walls; as parameters were set the scattering factor "S" = 0.45, the crosspolarization fraction "K-pol" = 0.4, and the alpha value, i.e., the amplitude of the lobe scatterer ray, as 4 [33]- [36].…”
Section: Electric Field Calculation Through Raytracingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[129], [144] Hall [20], [21], [46], [55], [118], [119], [131], [132] Shopping mall [138] Station [124], [134], [138] Warehouse [80], [130] Theater [124] A room [20], [87] Underground convoy [10] Museum [20] Lobby [124], [134] Outdoor to indoor [22], [28] Room to room [88], [121], [195] Indoor wall [66], [78] Outdoor Urban [14], [24], [58], [59], [62], [76], [77], [120], [134], [139] City center [16], [47], [127], [128], [143] Rural [44], [53], [54] Street [11],…”
Section: Environment Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, as the frequency increases, surfaces appear rougher and lead to more diffuse scatterings [4], there is higher path loss, and higher sensitivity to line-of-sight (LOS) blockage. For non-LOS (NLOS) mmWave propagation, especially for vehicle-to-everything communications in urban scenarios [5], specular components together with single-bounce diffuse components form a majority of the overall channel gain [4]. Diffuse multipath is often treated as a disturbance, though geometry-based diffuse scattering channel models can also be considered, where each surface contributes with a cluster of paths, all with similar angles and delays [6], [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%