2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11009-019-09722-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion Approximation of a Risk Model with Non-Stationary Hawkes Arrivals of Claims

Abstract: We consider a classical risk process with arrival of claims following a non-stationary Hawkes process. We study the asymptotic regime when the premium rate and the baseline intensity of the claims arrival process are large, and claim size is small. The main goal of the article is to establish a diffusion approximation by verifying a functional central limit theorem and to compute the ruin probability in finite-time horizon. Numerical results will also be given. MSC2010: primary 91B30; secondary 60F17, 60G55.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hawkes Processes for Insurance Since recently, insurance companies are developing an interest for Hawkes processes. They are used for calculating Solvency Capital Requirements and modelling different indicators of risks, such as ruin (improvement of Cramer-Lundberg model, see Cheng and Seol (2020)) or cyber-attacks (see Bessy-Roland et al (2020)). Hawkes processes model claims arrival, considered to follow a Poisson process in classic approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hawkes Processes for Insurance Since recently, insurance companies are developing an interest for Hawkes processes. They are used for calculating Solvency Capital Requirements and modelling different indicators of risks, such as ruin (improvement of Cramer-Lundberg model, see Cheng and Seol (2020)) or cyber-attacks (see Bessy-Roland et al (2020)). Hawkes processes model claims arrival, considered to follow a Poisson process in classic approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%