2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-017-1376-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion brazing of Ti–6Al–4V and AISI 304: an EBSD study and mechanical properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gray micro-region A containing 34.56 at.% Ti and 65.44 at.% Cu is inferred as TiCu2. The detection of TiCu2 in the bonding area was also reported by Ehsan et al [14] in Ti6Al4V/AISI 304 steel bonding with Cu interlayer and by Elrefaey and Tillmann [15] in Ti/low carbon steel bonding with Cu-12Mn-2Ni (wt %) interlayer. For the light-gray micro-region B, the atomic ratio of Ti/Cu is about 1:4, corresponding to TiCu4.…”
Section: Microstructure Of Joint With Ti/cu/ti Multi-foilssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The gray micro-region A containing 34.56 at.% Ti and 65.44 at.% Cu is inferred as TiCu2. The detection of TiCu2 in the bonding area was also reported by Ehsan et al [14] in Ti6Al4V/AISI 304 steel bonding with Cu interlayer and by Elrefaey and Tillmann [15] in Ti/low carbon steel bonding with Cu-12Mn-2Ni (wt %) interlayer. For the light-gray micro-region B, the atomic ratio of Ti/Cu is about 1:4, corresponding to TiCu4.…”
Section: Microstructure Of Joint With Ti/cu/ti Multi-foilssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Ti 2 Cu with α-Ti was produced by eutectoid reaction β-Ti ↔ α-Ti + Ti 2 Cu. e content of the TiFe phase is less than that of the CuTi phase, which is due to the fact that the diffusion rate of Ti in Cu is higher than that of Fe in Cu, thus declining the brittleness of joints [72]. Norouzi et al [73] also studied the effect of bonding time on the property of the transient liquid-phase bonded joints with copper as the interlayer.…”
Section: Cu Interlayermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the direct diffusion-bonded joints exhibited better shear properties, whereas the shear performance of the joints produced with the Cu interlayer (Figure 9 MPa) produced by direct bonding [4,40] and with Cu and Ni interlayers. [2,12,14,25,30,31,41] However, these values are higher than those reported by Elrefaey and Tillmann [27] for CP-Ti/Cu/low carbon steel (50-105 MPa) and by Ö zdemir and Bilgin [42] for Ti64/Cu/SS (20 to 120 MPa). Nevertheless, the shear strength results of the present study are comparable to those of the Ti64/IF steel joint reported by Kaya et al [17] Most of these studies claimed that Ti-Fe intermetallics at the interface are more detrimental than other intermetallics.…”
Section: Interface Microstructure Of the Joint Produced With Cu+ni Inmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…[27] Both the spot and line EDS analyses showed the presence of a significant amount of Ti on the Fe side (i.e., layer F) and resulted in formation of the TiFe intermetallic phase due to the reduced barrier effect of the Cu interlayer and increased interdiffusion between Ti and Cu. [2,30] It is important to note that the bonding temperature of 1123 K is still below the eutectic transformation temperature of Ti-Cu (~1148 K). [29] Hence, no formation of any transient liquid phase and Cu 2 Ti compound formation can be expected under these bonding conditions.…”
Section: A Microstructures At Interfaces Of the Diffusion-bonded Jointsmentioning
confidence: 99%