2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion coefficient orientation distribution function for diffusion magnetic resonance imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here boldqbold0$$ {\mathbf{q}}_{\mathbf{0}} $$ is a unit vector (boldqbold0normalT·boldqbold0=1$$ {\mathbf{q}}_{\mathbf{0}}^{\mathrm{T}}\cdotp {\mathbf{q}}_{\mathbf{0}}=1 $$) in q‐space, ρ$$ \rho $$ is the length of boldqfalse(false|boldqfalse|=ρfalse)$$ \mathbf{q}\left(|\mathbf{q}|=\rho \right) $$, and afalse(boldqbold0false)$$ a\left({\mathbf{q}}_{\mathbf{0}}\right) $$ is defined as: afalse(boldqbold0false)=prefix−logfalse(Efalse(boldqbold0false)false)=logfalse(S0false/Sfalse(boldqbold0false)false),$$ a\left({\mathbf{q}}_{\mathbf{0}}\right)=-\log \left(E\left({\mathbf{q}}_{\mathbf{0}}\right)\right)=\log \left({S}_0/S\left({\mathbf{q}}_{\mathbf{0}}\right)\right), $$ where Sfalse(boldqbold0false)$$ S\left({\mathbf{q}}_{\mathbf{0}}\right) $$ is the signal value associated with the unit vector boldqbold0$$ {\mathbf{q}}_{\mathbf{0}} $$ in q‐space, and S0$$ {S}_0 $$ is the signal without diffusion weighting. Equations ()–() are reformulations of our previous results 26 …”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here boldqbold0$$ {\mathbf{q}}_{\mathbf{0}} $$ is a unit vector (boldqbold0normalT·boldqbold0=1$$ {\mathbf{q}}_{\mathbf{0}}^{\mathrm{T}}\cdotp {\mathbf{q}}_{\mathbf{0}}=1 $$) in q‐space, ρ$$ \rho $$ is the length of boldqfalse(false|boldqfalse|=ρfalse)$$ \mathbf{q}\left(|\mathbf{q}|=\rho \right) $$, and afalse(boldqbold0false)$$ a\left({\mathbf{q}}_{\mathbf{0}}\right) $$ is defined as: afalse(boldqbold0false)=prefix−logfalse(Efalse(boldqbold0false)false)=logfalse(S0false/Sfalse(boldqbold0false)false),$$ a\left({\mathbf{q}}_{\mathbf{0}}\right)=-\log \left(E\left({\mathbf{q}}_{\mathbf{0}}\right)\right)=\log \left({S}_0/S\left({\mathbf{q}}_{\mathbf{0}}\right)\right), $$ where Sfalse(boldqbold0false)$$ S\left({\mathbf{q}}_{\mathbf{0}}\right) $$ is the signal value associated with the unit vector boldqbold0$$ {\mathbf{q}}_{\mathbf{0}} $$ in q‐space, and S0$$ {S}_0 $$ is the signal without diffusion weighting. Equations ()–() are reformulations of our previous results 26 …”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Equations ( 3)-( 6) are reformulations of our previous results. 26 Therefore, the integral in (4) can be expressed as:…”
Section: General Methodology For the Calculation Of 𝚿(U)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the assumption that the diffusion of water molecules obeys a Gaussian distribution, DTI is the most widely used technique to assess white matter changes. However, due to the presence of cell membranes, neurons, and other organelles in tissues, the diffusion of water molecules obeys a non-Gaussian distribution (Shi et al, 2021); hence, the parameters of DTI, including mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AD), radial diffusivity (RD) and fractional anisotropy (FA), cannot describe water diffusion accurately. Diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) is regarded as a complementary technique for DTI, which can not only probe white matter changes accurately but can also assess the microstructural alternations in the gray matter which by the aggregation of many neuron cells and dendrites (Jensen et al, 2005).Studies have shown that the parameters of DKI, including mean kurtosis (MK), axial kurtosis (AK), radial kurtosis (RK) and kurtosis fractional anisotropy (KFA) is more suitable for assessing microstructural changes of white matter and gray matter regions with complex fiber arrangements (Qiao et al, 2020;Thaler et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 In recent years, several methods have been proposed for automatic fibers segmentation. Poulin et al proposed the use of a Feed-Forward Neural Network, and a Recurrent Neural Network for fibers segmentation, demonstrating high performers on the ISMRM 2015 segmentation challenge, 11 enabling to recover of more than 50% of the spatial coverage. 12 Lam et al 13 proposed the TRAFIC tool, and trained the arcuate fasciculus frontotemporal bundle on the right and left, reaching ∼52% and 70% of accuracy, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%