2000
DOI: 10.1021/es991195h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion Coefficients and Polydispersities of the Suwannee River Fulvic Acid:  Comparison of Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy, Pulsed-Field Gradient Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, and Flow Field-Flow Fractionation

Abstract: Diffusion coefficients of the Suwannee River fulvic acid (SRFA) obtained using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS), pulsed-field gradient nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (PFG-NMR), and flow field-flow fractionation (FlFFF) were compared as a function of pH (4.0−8.5) and ionic strength (5−500 mM). Diffusion coefficients of the SRFA ranged between 1.9 and 3.5 × 10-10 m2 s-1. These values were fairly constant as a function of both pH and ionic strength and comparable to the limited literature valu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
97
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
17
97
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Diffusion coefficient (D) and molecular mass distributions (MM) were calculated for the samples. D varied from 3.81 to 4.35 × 10 10 m 2 s -1 which is in the range of values previously published for humic and fulvic acids (1,6). Two different MM fractions (2 peaks), based on the maximum peak intensities, were found in low salinity water samples based on their fluorescence.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Diffusion coefficient (D) and molecular mass distributions (MM) were calculated for the samples. D varied from 3.81 to 4.35 × 10 10 m 2 s -1 which is in the range of values previously published for humic and fulvic acids (1,6). Two different MM fractions (2 peaks), based on the maximum peak intensities, were found in low salinity water samples based on their fluorescence.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Although average measures are most often quantified, environmental colloids are always polydisperse, often with undefined size distributions. Size distributions can be determined experimentally by field-flow fractionation (FFF) [21,22], electron microscopy [15,23,24] and atomic force microscopy (AFM) [15,25,26] and calculated from fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) [27][28][29] and dynamic light scattering [30]. Nevertheless, the techniques each have different detection limits and detection windows corresponding to different size ranges (Figure 1).…”
Section: The Importance Of Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst sampling challenges in extreme environments (Kadar and Powell, 2006) and the lack of analytical techniques for detection and characterisation of natural NPs (Lead et al, 2000) have prevented in depth study of the actual morphology, mineralogy and chemical properties of the NPs emitted in deep sea hydrothermal fluids until recently, shallow seeps may be a more accessible site for such studies. The contrasting geological settings, distributions, biogeochemistry, and dynamics of vent and seep ecosystems render distinctive characteristics ranging from the source of reduced compounds available for microbial transformation into energy through chemical oxidation, to the nature of the substratum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%