1969
DOI: 10.1051/jcp/196966s20136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion et transport ionique dans les halogénures alcalins fondus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A more marked crossing was observed, whatever the temperature; the mobility of the lithium ions decreased much more rapidly than that of the potassium ions. However, surprisingly, as already obtained for the nitrate melts, the diffusion measurements did not show any crossing, the lighter ions moved always faster than the heavier ones in the whole concentration range [30].…”
Section: The Chemla Effectsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…A more marked crossing was observed, whatever the temperature; the mobility of the lithium ions decreased much more rapidly than that of the potassium ions. However, surprisingly, as already obtained for the nitrate melts, the diffusion measurements did not show any crossing, the lighter ions moved always faster than the heavier ones in the whole concentration range [30].…”
Section: The Chemla Effectsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…It has been found , that the binary system (Li, K)Br containing a trace amount of radioactive Na + , investigated by Chemla’s group, can be regarded as an “ideal system” in the sense that C ILi , C IK , and even C INa for Na + are constant over the whole investigated concentration range, both in the lower temperature range (below 923 K) and at a higher temperature (1023 K), except for one case: the C IK in pure LiBr (radioisotope 42 K was used) at 1023 K is significantly higher than that at the other concentrations. , This has been attributed to the agitation effect by the abundant Li + ions; we assume that this effect overcomes the tranquilization effect. This is in contrast with the present case, probably because the mass of Br − A as the attracting anion is too large compared with that of the tranquilizer Li + (see Figure b), and the second step of Br − (see Figure b) will not be retarded as much by the cohesive tranquilizer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemla discovered the Chemla effect more than 50 years ago; he submitted a French patent in 1958, in which he claimed that in countercurrent electromigration (the Klemm method) of the binary mixture of molten (Li, K)Br, the molar ratio of Li/K attains to a limited value at the anode, whereas the isotope ratio ( 7 Li/ 6 Li) (and also ( 41 K/ 39 K)) continues to increase with time. It was found later that this strange behavior is caused by the crossing of the isotherms of the mobilities of Li + and K + as a function of the mole fraction in the (Li, K)Br mixture. At a higher concentration of LiBr, Li + is more mobile, and at a lower concentration of LiBr, K + is more mobile. That is, the more enriched cation than at the crossing-point concentration migrates faster in the anode compartment, where the ratio of the two cations, therefore, attains to that at the crossing point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations