1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-4526(99)00606-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion in isotopically controlled semiconductor systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inter-diffusion coefficients were directly obtained from the width of the concentration profiles by using the Boltzmann-Matano analysis in the form 2 , where L D is the diffusion length, t is annealing time, D i is the interdiffusion coefficient and x i is the full width half maximum (FWHM) of the as-grown QW, while x f is the FWHM after anneal for time, t. Figures 2(a In comparison, reported activation energies for Ga-Al interdiffusion range from 1 eV to 6.2 eV, and values of the pre-factor range over 22 orders of magnitude, as shown in [13]. Our value of the activation energy obtained for uncapped structures is close to those previously reported in [13][14][15], while the activation energy for SiO 2 capped samples is lower compared to some previously reported [16,17] (2.72 eV).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The inter-diffusion coefficients were directly obtained from the width of the concentration profiles by using the Boltzmann-Matano analysis in the form 2 , where L D is the diffusion length, t is annealing time, D i is the interdiffusion coefficient and x i is the full width half maximum (FWHM) of the as-grown QW, while x f is the FWHM after anneal for time, t. Figures 2(a In comparison, reported activation energies for Ga-Al interdiffusion range from 1 eV to 6.2 eV, and values of the pre-factor range over 22 orders of magnitude, as shown in [13]. Our value of the activation energy obtained for uncapped structures is close to those previously reported in [13][14][15], while the activation energy for SiO 2 capped samples is lower compared to some previously reported [16,17] (2.72 eV).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In comparison, reported activation energies for Ga-Al interdiffusion range from 1 eV to 6.2 eV, and values of the pre-factor range over 22 orders of magnitude, as shown in[13]. Our value of the activation energy obtained for uncapped structures is close to those previously reported in[13][14][15], while the activation energy for SiO 2 capped samples is lower compared to some previously reported[16,17] (2.72 eV).Ga diffusion into SiO 2 has been observed[18,19] and it is generally accepted[2,10] that larger QWI for SiO 2 capped samples occurs due to this Ga out-diffusion leaving behind a high concentration of vacancies in the top GaAs layer, which enhances the inter-diffusion. However, vacancy diffusion is not expected to result in the square-like evolution of the QWs[11].…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…[1][2][3] Since the total number of dislocations at which such point defects are absorbed has been reduced due to the development of growth techniques such as the vapor pressure-controlled liquid-encapsulated Czochralski ͑CZ͒ method ͑VLEC͒ and the vertical gradient freezing method ͑VGF͒, the effects of such point defects on the electronic characteristics of substrates has become dominant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Control of the distribution of point defects in growing crystals of GaAs is a key issue for fabrication of a high-quality power amplifier in a cellular phone, because such control enables the stabilization of deviation of the Fermi level due to the unbalance of charge compensation in semi-insulating gallium arsenide ͑GaAs͒ substrates. [1][2][3] Since the total number of dislocations at which such point defects are absorbed has been reduced due to the development of growth techniques such as the vapor pressure-controlled liquid-encapsulated Czochralski ͑CZ͒ method ͑VLEC͒ and the vertical gradient freezing method ͑VGF͒, the effects of such point defects on the electronic characteristics of substrates has become dominant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%