2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-7753(99)00489-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion layer parameters influencing optimal fuel cell performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
160
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 301 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
4
160
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the present results indicate coherently that a larger porosity of the GDL leads to a higher current density, and to some extent a better performance of the fuel cell, a high porosity is accompanied by water flooding in the GDL and this decreases markedly the cell voltage [16]. Besides, as concluded by the present paper, a fuel cell with a higher surface overpotential, η, may require a GDL of greater porosity because more oxygen is necessary to support the active electrochemical reaction.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the present results indicate coherently that a larger porosity of the GDL leads to a higher current density, and to some extent a better performance of the fuel cell, a high porosity is accompanied by water flooding in the GDL and this decreases markedly the cell voltage [16]. Besides, as concluded by the present paper, a fuel cell with a higher surface overpotential, η, may require a GDL of greater porosity because more oxygen is necessary to support the active electrochemical reaction.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…In fact, the GDL is composed of a thin layer of carbon black mixed with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), a carbon paper consisting of rigid carbon fibbers with a diameter of about 10 m, and a porous structure formed by carbon fibbers with a pore size of 20-50 m and 70-80% porosity of volume. Any change in the composition or the morphology of the GDL can lead to a substantial influence on fuel cell performance owing to a porosity change [16][17][18][19]. In practice, the presence of water generated in the GDL during fuel cell operation can also change the effective porosity, and this change may vary with time and position.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MPL thickness is a crucial parameter to be controlled in order to improve overall device performance and several studies pointed out an optimal value in the range 50-90 µm [30,[34][35][36][37][38]. For this reason, prepared samples were evaluated in terms of MPL thickness by means of SEM analysis, as reported in Figure 3.…”
Section: Physical Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yuan et al [1] reported EIS has already become a primary tool in PEMFC research. EIS method is also used effectively for analyses of the amount of catalysts [2][3][4][5], nafion content [3,[6][7][8], membrane thickness [9,10], GDL structure [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19], proton conductivity [20][21][22][23][24][25][26], humidification condition [3,9,[27][28][29][30] and stack [24,[31][32][33][34][35][36]. For example, Paganin et al [2] and Song et al [3] suggested that charge transfer resistance is much smaller with increasing amount of catalysts.…”
Section: Page 3 Of 34mentioning
confidence: 99%