Diffusion of a social norm: tracing the emergence of the housewife in the Netherlands, 1812–1922¹

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may SummaryThe emergence of the housewife in the Netherlands over the period 1812-1922 was strongly influenced by the social norm that women should withdraw from the labour market on the eve of marriage. Adherence to this norm is most clearly reflected in the emergence of the housewife among the lower classes, especially at the close of the nineteenth century among wives of farmers. Women in urban municipalities, however, set the norm far earlier and differences across social classes were significantly larger in towns than in rural areas. Paradoxically, the rise of the housewife did not change work pressures for lower-class women. This paradox is resolved by noting that they substituted registered work for unregistered work, e.g., in house industries, working in the family firm or farm.( The present study tries to make the tacit element in choices -the preference switch to which De Vries refers -more explicit and focuses on the emergence of the housewife in the Netherlands in the period 1812-1922. We will do so with the aid of marriage certificates. The story that unfolds is that the choice of women to withdraw from the labour market upon marriage is the result of three forces: (1) the intrinsic value of household 'products' (health, domesticity, schooling of children); (2) the reputational costs and benefits linked to becoming a housewife; and (3) the effects of choice on one's self-conception, or as Kuran would call it 'expressive utility'. 7The intrinsic value of household production offers the core rationale for the social beliefs about how health and human wealth are created within the household and how labour should be divided. One reason given for women to stay at home was that it was the right thing to do for a mother. What makes our story so remarkable is that women withdrew from the labour market before children were born. This would suggest that the choice of entering marriage as a housewife was driven primarily by social norms.Social norms -the second factor -operate as taxes and subsidies of individual choice and appear in many guises, such as laws, rules of conduct, wage discrimination and subsidies, working conditions, dismissal of women who become pregnant or pregnancy leave without pay, stereotyping, etc. The list of instruments to penalise the efforts of married women to accept work is long and diverse.The third factor is closely related to the presence of norms. For example, a bride may choose to sta...

Ideal versus reality? The domesticity ideal and household labour relations in Dutch industrializing regions, circa 1890

“…Nevertheless, her arguments are still relevant in light of more recent research because the separate-spheres theory is still often interpreted as a dichotomy between a male and a female sphere, and as one between labour and domesticity. For instance, recent research has argued that women increasingly withdrew from the labour market to live up to society's increasing desire for domesticity and full-time housewifery (Minoletti, 2013;Van Poppel et al, 2009). This conclusion implies that the private sphere ideally was to be freed from any type of gainful work and that women needed to stay out of the public sphere, i.e.…”

“…According to some scholars, this decline was caused by middle-class social norms regarding domesticity spreading through the working class during the second half of the nineteenth century (de regt, 1984;de Swaan, 1989). Because the housewife was crucial for a domestic lifestyle, task division within the household became more pronounced with men providing an income and women specializing in homemaking tasks (Van Poppel, Van Dalen, & Walhout, 2009). Moreover, in the Netherlands, the domesticity ideal was presumably already prevalent during the early modern period (de Vries & van der Woude, 1997).…”

The Success of the Civilization Offensive: Societal Adaptation of Reformed Boys in the Early Twentieth Century in the Netherlands

“…For doing so, we use data from the Genlias project 33 that have father-son professions retrieved from marriage certificates in 1922 in the provinces Zeeland, Limburg, Gelderland, Overijssel, and Groningen. 34 The Genlias cohort is not entirely appropriate as it was slightly younger and stepped into the labour market just before the economic crisis; to this our Harreveld men would compare unfavourably. On the other hand the sons were measured at younger ages than their father, which is unfavourable for assessing progress on the professional ladder; to this our Harreveld men would compare positively.…”

Studying historical occupational careers with multilevel growth models

“…Until the 1950s these models became even more deeply rooted in Dutch society. As shown by van Poppel, van Dalen, and Walhout (2009) for example, from the 1820s onwards increasingly fewer Dutch women registered their occupations in official documents such as marriage certificates. We therefore expect H7a: Over time men increasingly had a higher occupational status after marriage than before marriage.…”

“…Instead, they concentrated their activities in cottage industries, family farm labor, serving and personal services. Thus working in areas in which informal, less organized, and less successful careers took place (Leydesdorff 1977;van Poppel, van Dalen, and Walhout 2009).…”