1977
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3115(77)90026-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion of chromium in Inconel-600

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present investigation, more precipitates have been observed at a tempering temperature of 1033 K in comparison with 1013 K. Hence grain boundary energy is less in the former case than the latter, which results in increased activation energy in the temperature regime of 1033e1053 K as compared to 1013e1033 K. Based on the values of activation energy in the temperature regime of 1013e1033 K and 1033e1053 K, it can be concluded that the rate controlling mechanism of the growth of the precipitate is the diffusion of interstitial solute carbon in the former case (97e133 kJ mol À1 ) [21] and it is the diffusion of substitutional solute chromium in the later case (~210e~272 kJ mol À1 ) [21]. Similar activation energy values have been reported by Pruthi et al [22] for volume diffusion of chromium (278 kJ/mol) in Inconel 600.…”
Section: Microstructuresupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In the present investigation, more precipitates have been observed at a tempering temperature of 1033 K in comparison with 1013 K. Hence grain boundary energy is less in the former case than the latter, which results in increased activation energy in the temperature regime of 1033e1053 K as compared to 1013e1033 K. Based on the values of activation energy in the temperature regime of 1013e1033 K and 1033e1053 K, it can be concluded that the rate controlling mechanism of the growth of the precipitate is the diffusion of interstitial solute carbon in the former case (97e133 kJ mol À1 ) [21] and it is the diffusion of substitutional solute chromium in the later case (~210e~272 kJ mol À1 ) [21]. Similar activation energy values have been reported by Pruthi et al [22] for volume diffusion of chromium (278 kJ/mol) in Inconel 600.…”
Section: Microstructuresupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The reader may refer to the following papers for diffusion data. [9,[33][34][35] The comparison of these values with the apparent activation energies for PLC effect determined by various methods in this study is consistent with what has been published by different authors for this alloy.…”
Section: B Identification Of Solute Elements Involved In Dsasupporting
confidence: 89%
“…A decrease in temperature from 600 ЊC to 400 ЊC implies a decrease of at least of the reciprocal of temperature. This value is relatively close to the activation energy for matrix diffusion of chromium in five orders of magnitude in the rate of the controlling process, if there is no change in the mechanism with respect to that nickel-based alloys such as Alloy 600 (Ni-15 pct Cr-6 pct Fe), which is 277.7 kJ/mole, [21] and Alloy 800 (32 pct Niprevailing in the 600 ЊC to 700 ЊC range. This implies that heat treatments extended for more than 18 years will be 21 pct Cr-45 pct Fe), with a value of 287.4 kJ/mole.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…This implies that heat treatments extended for more than 18 years will be 21 pct Cr-45 pct Fe), with a value of 287.4 kJ/mole. [22] Data for binary Ni-Cr alloys reported by Pruthi et al [21] also required at 400 ЊC to obtain the degree of sensitization observed in the high-temperature range. In order to study indicate that the activation energy increases with increasing chromium content, reaching about 290.4 kJ/mole for Nithe thermal stability of Alloy 825 at temperatures closer to those expected under repository conditions within a realistic 29.7 pct Cr.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%