1939
DOI: 10.1021/ja01876a032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion Velocity and Molecular Weight. I. The Limits of Validity of the Stokes--Einstein Diffusion Equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

1951
1951
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are given in Table 1. D2 values could not be calculated for polyglucose, as no value of its diffusion coefficient in water was available. The diffusion coefficient (at 200 C) of serum albumin was taken as 6-1 x 10-7 cm2/sec (Kekwick, 1938), and that of glucose as 5-9 x 10-6 cm2/sec (Friedman & Carpenter, 1939). A single experiment was also done on the diffusion of serum albumin in water and in a gel made by heating a 0-3 % solution of soluble collagen to 370 C; the values of Dx were almost identical, showing that collagen gel of this concentration has little effect.…”
Section: Diffusion Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results are given in Table 1. D2 values could not be calculated for polyglucose, as no value of its diffusion coefficient in water was available. The diffusion coefficient (at 200 C) of serum albumin was taken as 6-1 x 10-7 cm2/sec (Kekwick, 1938), and that of glucose as 5-9 x 10-6 cm2/sec (Friedman & Carpenter, 1939). A single experiment was also done on the diffusion of serum albumin in water and in a gel made by heating a 0-3 % solution of soluble collagen to 370 C; the values of Dx were almost identical, showing that collagen gel of this concentration has little effect.…”
Section: Diffusion Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 However, the Stokes-Einstein equation is based on the assumption of free diffusion, which requires the diffusion coefficient to be determined at infinite dilution 6,7,8,9. It is also known that the diffusion coefficient varies considerably with the concentration of the diffusate thus it is difficult to calculate the exact FW of a species from a single DOSY experiment at a fixed concentration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of the size of the alcohols, this result was expected as the free volume theory would predict. 37,38 This behavior suggests that size rather than intermolecular interaction (hydrogen bonds in particular) dominates the diffusion process. 23 Here, it was expected that methanol would diffuse more slowly as it has the highest ability to form hydrogen bonds.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%