2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0927-0256(02)00253-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusional phase transformation and deformation in steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The misfit strain between the triphylite phase (Li 1−y FePO 4 ) and the heterosite phase (Li x FePO 4 ) in nanoLiFePO 4 particles was detected using X-ray diffraction (XRD), [4] and dislocations induced by misfit strain were observed in platelike LiFePO 4 particles using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) [8]. Such a strain-induced energy penalty can decrease the driving energy for phase transformation, [9] resulting in decrease of the phase transformation rate [10]. The accommodation energy decreases the lithiation equilibrium potential [9] but increases the delithiation potential, resulting in an equilibrium potential hysteresis [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The misfit strain between the triphylite phase (Li 1−y FePO 4 ) and the heterosite phase (Li x FePO 4 ) in nanoLiFePO 4 particles was detected using X-ray diffraction (XRD), [4] and dislocations induced by misfit strain were observed in platelike LiFePO 4 particles using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) [8]. Such a strain-induced energy penalty can decrease the driving energy for phase transformation, [9] resulting in decrease of the phase transformation rate [10]. The accommodation energy decreases the lithiation equilibrium potential [9] but increases the delithiation potential, resulting in an equilibrium potential hysteresis [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R is the perfect gas constant equal to 8.314 J/mol K. Nowadays, relations (5) and (6) are well admitted but different values for the diffusivity coefficient can be found in literature. For example, D 0 is equal to 0.1 cm 2 s À1 for Roy and Manna [19] whereas it is equal to 0.234 cm 2 s À1 for Gamsjager et al [20]. It should be noticed that the ratio between these two coefficients gives a value higher than 2.…”
Section: Optical Observationsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Indeed, Golovin et al [23] gives two limits depending on the chromium content in the steel: 135 kJ/mol when no chromium is present and 145 kJ/mol with it. For their part, Gamjager et al [20] and Agren [24] have used 148 kJ/mol and Lan et al [21] and Kumar et al [22], 143.3 kJ/mol. Then, we have retained 145 kJ/mol for Q A in order to take into account presence of chromium in the material (see Table 1).…”
Section: Optical Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Svoboda et al [81] and Gamsjager [82], the chemical driving force F chem can be expressed by…”
Section: Growth Of New Phasementioning
confidence: 99%