2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10639-022-11034-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DigComp-Based Digital competence Assessment Tools: Literature Review and Instrument Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If an instructor integrates digital competence into a course, analyzing the syllabus can help understand the instructor’s level of digital competence (Guillén-Gámez and Mayorga-Fernández 2020 ). Based on the digital competency framework (Mattar et al 2022 ) and the perspective of educational practice (Gower et al 1983 ; Richardson 1990 ), it is reasonable to assess the digital competency levels of teachers by analyzing their syllabi, and evaluating digital competence by identifying instructional media/tools and learning activities in a course related to the skill has been considered reasonable (Lucas et al 2021 ). For example, instructors may use software for direct instruction in the classroom, conduct computer-assisted instruction, implement educational games, use digital media for communication, or operate LMSs/platforms.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If an instructor integrates digital competence into a course, analyzing the syllabus can help understand the instructor’s level of digital competence (Guillén-Gámez and Mayorga-Fernández 2020 ). Based on the digital competency framework (Mattar et al 2022 ) and the perspective of educational practice (Gower et al 1983 ; Richardson 1990 ), it is reasonable to assess the digital competency levels of teachers by analyzing their syllabi, and evaluating digital competence by identifying instructional media/tools and learning activities in a course related to the skill has been considered reasonable (Lucas et al 2021 ). For example, instructors may use software for direct instruction in the classroom, conduct computer-assisted instruction, implement educational games, use digital media for communication, or operate LMSs/platforms.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because recent studies suggest that university instructors are responding to help future professionals adapt to industrial and job market changes in the digital age, the assessment of instructors' digital competencies requires more research attention (Antón-Sancho et al 2021 ; Sánchez-Cruzado et al 2021 ). Specifically, the literature using quantitative analysis is limited by the breadth of the questionnaire items, and the use of manual analysis methods is limited by manpower and time, highlighting the current need for more extensive and effective digital competency assessment solutions (Sillat et al 2021 ; Zhou 2021 ; Mattar et al 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These scales are in the selfassessment category. Measurement tools using DigComp-related frameworks are usually multiple-choice format (Mattar, Ramos, & Lucas, 2022). This framework can be used for knowledge-based assessment and in the preparation and definition of authentic tasks for performance-based assessment (Alarcón, et al, 2020).…”
Section: Assessment Of Teachers' Digital Competencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pour parvenir à évaluer les usages pédagogiques du numérique, plusieurs chercheuses et chercheurs ont développé des outils de collecte de données et se sont appuyés sur le modèle comme le Technology, Pedagogical, Content Knolwedge (TPACK) (Koehler et al, 2012;Schmidt et al, 2009), le référentiel de compétences DigComp (Mattar et al, 2022;Reisoğlu et Çebi, 2020) ou bien le modèle Will Skill Tool and Padagogy (WSTP) (Hancock et al, 2007;Knezek et Christensen, 2016). Les référentiels de compétences numériques ou de compétences du 21 e siècle comportent la plupart du temps des échelles de mesure, mais souvent, ils ne suffisent pas à rendre adéquatement compte de la complexité des usages pédagogiques du numérique en contexte éducatif, ou bien ils sont adaptés spécifiquement au contexte dans lequel ils sont destinés et donc difficilement transférables.…”
Section: Contexte Et Problématiqueunclassified