Digital Campaigning in France, a Wide Wild Web?

Abstract

In spite of the extensive media coverage of election technologies, the market and its players remain largely unknown. Who are they? What do they do? What are their strategies? This chapter leverages new empirical data to answer these questions, drawing in particular from a series of interviews with providers of political technology in France. We show that the sector is heterogeneous and that its boundaries are fluid, including actors who provide wildly different services and initially embraced different economic and technological strategies. We also show that the nature of the services provided as well as the partisan dimension of each company depends on its target customers. However, due to economic constraints, the sector is undergoing a radical restructuring. The laborious implementation of “elections 2.0” in France is continuing with an increasing professionalization of its players, leading the sector to become more homogeneous and internationalized.

From newspapers to social media? Changing dynamics in Swiss direct democratic campaigns

“…Digital technologies and social media are moving from the margin to the mainstream of political campaigning in many democracies (Ehrhard et al, 2020; Lilleker et al, 2015)–albeit at differential speed (Gibson, 2020). Inspired to some degree by the 2008 and 2012 Obama election campaigns, in the 2010s candidates and parties across the world started to integrate digital tools into their campaigns on a larger scale (e.g., Lilleker & Jackson, 2013).…”

On the edge of glory (…or catastrophe): regulation, transparency and party democracy in data-driven campaigning in Québec

“…However, when it comes to the use of digital technologies for electoral purposes, the US case is the exception rather than the rule (Enli and Moe, 2013;Gibson, 2015;Vaccari, 2013, p. ix). Indeed, data campaigning, as with other techniques of political communication, are conducted in specific contexts that affect what is accessible, possible and viable (Bennett, 2016;Dobber et al, 2017;Ehrhard et al, 2019;Flanagan, 2010, p. 156).…”