2006
DOI: 10.1007/11823100_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital Capability Assessment for eGovernment: A Multi-dimensional Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This idea was inspired by the successful practices and solid arguments in the domain of SERVQUAL and information technology-related capability management (ITCM) systems, such as the Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL) (Bon, 2007) and Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) (Barki, Rivard, & Talbot, 2001;Cresswell, Pardo, & Canestraro, 2006). However, few studies have examined a comparatively holistic measurement model of EGSC and elucidated the relationships among EGS-related capabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This idea was inspired by the successful practices and solid arguments in the domain of SERVQUAL and information technology-related capability management (ITCM) systems, such as the Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL) (Bon, 2007) and Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) (Barki, Rivard, & Talbot, 2001;Cresswell, Pardo, & Canestraro, 2006). However, few studies have examined a comparatively holistic measurement model of EGSC and elucidated the relationships among EGS-related capabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Many influential frameworks have been developed by field researchers such as Jaeger and Thompson (), Cresswell et al. (), Papadomichelaki et al. (), and McNaughton et al.…”
Section: Research Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…E-government goes far more that just using technology to provide online services; it often involves the integration of different services provided by public agencies, the provision of 24/7 service delivery, and the assimilation of new laws and government regulations (Andersen & Henriksen, 2006;Cresswell, Pardo, & Canestraro, 2006;Wimmer & Tambouris, 2002). It calls for technological changes to be accompanied by corresponding organizational changes (e.g., new institutions for new forms of interaction between public agencies), process redesign (e.g., new processes to operate under new service delivery modes), information technology (IT), governance implementation (to achieve alignment between IT resources and business objectives), and human capital training (e.g., training for staff to operate new technologies) (Valdes et al, 2011, p. 177).…”
Section: Understanding E-government: Conceptual Issues and Modelsmentioning
confidence: 98%