Digital control HIL comparison for adjustable speed drives

Nauel, Yoann; Todd, Rebecca

doi:10.1109/iecon.2016.7793904

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Unfortunately, the implementation of both algorithms was carried out using a real-time controller (dSPACE ds1103 system), which limited the overall conclusions. An interesting work was reported by Nauel and Todd [19]. They proposed an integral-proportional (IP) controller instead of a classical proportional-integral (PI) one.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

DSP-HIL Comparison between IM Drive Control Strategies

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Due to their high robustness and simple maintenance, induction motors (IM) are commonly applied in household appliances and industry. Recently, advanced control techniques are being applied to traditional controllers such as field-oriented control (FOC) and torque control (DTC). Dynamic performance improvement, hardware simplification and software resource reduction are some of the characteristics reported by these advanced techniques, where a comparison of the new proposal with a traditional structure is generally reported for its validation. However, an assessment between advanced techniques is usually missing. Therefore, we evaluated the traditional FOC and DTC with two additional advanced control modifications, fuzzy and predictive. The resulting six structures were numerically evaluated using MATLAB SIMULINK in a 5 HP four-pole three-phase IM and practically validated using hardware-in-the-loop (Typhoon HIL 402 and DSP TMS320F28035). Speed, torque, phase current and flux response are reported for the six controllers and practical insights are summarized.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%