2020
DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2020.1728447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital curation for promoting personalized learning: A study of secondary-school science students’ learning experiences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Across the globe, 39.3% of the 61 studies were conducted in Asia, 32.8% in the Americas, 26.6% in Europe, and 4.9% in Oceania 3 (see Table S3). All studies conducted in Asia belonged to the Group A research in terms of research purpose, except for one that explored a school-wide digital curation project for promoting PL experiences in the Israel context (Tsybulsky, 2020). As for grade level, 30 studies focused on elementary school students, and 27 studies reported outcomes for secondary school students (see Table S3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Across the globe, 39.3% of the 61 studies were conducted in Asia, 32.8% in the Americas, 26.6% in Europe, and 4.9% in Oceania 3 (see Table S3). All studies conducted in Asia belonged to the Group A research in terms of research purpose, except for one that explored a school-wide digital curation project for promoting PL experiences in the Israel context (Tsybulsky, 2020). As for grade level, 30 studies focused on elementary school students, and 27 studies reported outcomes for secondary school students (see Table S3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7.1 Various technologies : Optimize individual choice and autonomy over learning such as what to investigate and demonstrate, working at their pace, working independently or in groups, sequencing of learning content (Abawi, 2015; Admiraal et al, 2020; Alcoholado et al, 2011; Basham et al, 2016; Kim et al, 2019; Looi et al, 2009; Martín‐SanJosé et al, 2014; McCarthy, Liu, & Schauer, 2020; Phan, 2020; Phillips et al, 2020; Schmid & Petko, 2019; Song et al, 2012; Tsybulsky, 2020); Provide autonomy in improvisation to create meaningful contexts (Looi et al, 2009); Allow student to choose which mathematical task topics based on interest (Clinton & Walkington, 2019; Høgheim & Reber, 2015); Incorporate learner‐selected vocabulary into learning content (Choi & Ma, 2015); Allow for customization of online learning texts with choice background colour, picture, font style (Ertem, 2013); Increase autonomy over learning through interest‐ and skill‐driven goal setting or choice provision (DeMink‐Carthew et al, 2020; DeMink‐Carthew & Netcoh, 2019; DeMink‐Carthew & Olofson, 2020)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the implementation differences, PL practice and technology integration benefited the academic performance of learners [40][41][42][43]. Focusing on K-12 learners, Tsybulsky [44] tested the impacts of digital curation and the utilization of digital tools in choosing, preserving, collecting, arranging, classifying, and sharing digital assets on a PL science subject through a phenomenological qualitative approach. The outcome indicates the potential for digital curation in PL and the improvement of cognitive and emotional learning experiences.…”
Section: Plmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disengagement leads to reducing the variety of knowledge and information that can be achieved by students in their learning. In addition, students who are disengaged in learning limit their capacity to understand their learning experiences (Attard, 2011;Baek, 2019;Cho et al, 2021;Hava et al, 2020;Peker & Ataöv, 2020;Selvanathan et al, 2020;Tsybulsky, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%