2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.compcom.2007.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital Divide 2.0: “Generation M” and Online Social Networking Sites in the Composition Classroom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
54
0
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
54
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The introduction of a wide range of such innovative new technologies into teaching and learning contexts underpins the necessity of reflecting upon their proposed role and contribution within this distinct environment. Examples of such Web 2.0 tools which have recently been evaluated as potential learning aids include: podcasts (Lonn and Teasley 2009;Walls et al, 2010); online games (Paraskeva, Mysirlaki & Papagianni, 2010); smart phones (Cochrane & Bateman, 2010); wikis (Elgort, Smith & Toland, 2008;Zorko, 2009) and social networking sites (Vie, 2008;Lockyer & Patterson, 2008).…”
Section: Introducing Blogging and Call Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The introduction of a wide range of such innovative new technologies into teaching and learning contexts underpins the necessity of reflecting upon their proposed role and contribution within this distinct environment. Examples of such Web 2.0 tools which have recently been evaluated as potential learning aids include: podcasts (Lonn and Teasley 2009;Walls et al, 2010); online games (Paraskeva, Mysirlaki & Papagianni, 2010); smart phones (Cochrane & Bateman, 2010); wikis (Elgort, Smith & Toland, 2008;Zorko, 2009) and social networking sites (Vie, 2008;Lockyer & Patterson, 2008).…”
Section: Introducing Blogging and Call Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduction of a wide range of such innovative new technologies into teaching and learning contexts underpins the necessity of reflecting upon their proposed role and contribution within this distinct environment. Examples of such Web 2.0 tools which have recently been evaluated as potential learning aids include: podcasts (Lonn and Teasley 2009;Walls et al, 2010); online games (Paraskeva, Mysirlaki & Papagianni, 2010); smart phones (Cochrane & 210 Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2010, 26(2) Bateman, 2010); wikis (Elgort, Smith & Toland, 2008;Zorko, 2009) and social networking sites (Vie, 2008;Lockyer & Patterson, 2008).While already established within recreational online activities, the main challenge in exploiting these tools lies in establishing clear contexts of use across different disciplines in higher education. Thus, while some Web 2.0 applications are already being used in academic institutions as valid alternative approaches to the teaching of computer science, mathematics and statistics (Alt, 2006), CALL practitioners and teachers have also been quick to appreciate, evaluate and integrate such applications (Godwin-Jones, 2003;.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even the very term used in many SNS to describe connected users, "friends", may challenge traditional student-teacher hierarchy, as traditionally teachers are allowed some power over their students even when close relationship between the two are developed (Ang, 2005;Jaimeson & Thomas, 1974;Steinfield, Ellison, & Lampe, 2008;Vie, 2008). Albeit, closeness and friendship may be different in SNS compared to the real world (e.g., Subrahmanyam, Reich, Waechter, & Espinoza, 2008;Van House, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information and communication technology (ICT) is the prevalent mode of communication among them, with 75 percent of 12 to 17 year olds owning cell phones, and text messaging at an incredible rate of more than 3000 messages per month [1]. This new generation is referred to as 'net savvy' youth [2], Google generation [3], and generation M, for Media, MySpace, or the Millenials [4] among other titles. The most common term, however, is the digital natives; those born after 1989, who may process information "different from their predecessors" [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%