2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital divides? Student and staff perceptions of information and communication technologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
162
1
22

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 291 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
162
1
22
Order By: Relevance
“…Este conjunto de transformaciones introduce importantes cambios en la concepción que los nativos digitales futuros profesionales de la comunicación poseen de los medios de comunicación y en el tipo de usos que realizan de las redes sociales. (WAYCOTT, et al, 2010). Ambos aspectos exigen cambios imprescindibles en el escenario académico para garantizar una formación adaptada a las nuevas nece sidades formativas que introduce la red de redes.…”
Section: Introducción Los Futuros Comunicadores Ante Las Redes Socialesunclassified
“…Este conjunto de transformaciones introduce importantes cambios en la concepción que los nativos digitales futuros profesionales de la comunicación poseen de los medios de comunicación y en el tipo de usos que realizan de las redes sociales. (WAYCOTT, et al, 2010). Ambos aspectos exigen cambios imprescindibles en el escenario académico para garantizar una formación adaptada a las nuevas nece sidades formativas que introduce la red de redes.…”
Section: Introducción Los Futuros Comunicadores Ante Las Redes Socialesunclassified
“…As we learned in our departments, engaging the different generations can be challenging (Pfeil et al, 2009;Waycott et al, 2009). Baby boomers and even gen-Xers tend to be suspicious of new technologies as fad, whereas gen-Yers are more open, and gen-Zers appear to be fully digital in orientation.…”
Section: Social Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include studies in the United States (Hargittai, 2010;Salaway, et al, 2008;Smith, et al, 2009;Borreson Caruso. 2010) andCanada (Salajan, et al, 2010;Bullen, et al, 2009) , Australia (Judd and Kennedy forthcoming;Kennedy, et al, 2006Kennedy, et al, , 2007Kennedy, et al, , 2008Kennedy, et al, , 2010Oliver and Goerke, 2007;Waycott, et al, 2009), United Kingdom (Margaryan, et al, 2011;Jones and Healing 2010a;Jones and Hosein 2010;Jones and Cross, 2009;Selwyn 2008), other European countries (Schulmeister, 2010;Ryberg, et al, 2010;Pedró, 2009), South Africa (Thinyane, 2010;Brown and Czerniewicz, 2010;Czerniewicz, et al, 2009), Chile (Sánchez, et al, 2010) and Hongkong (McNaught, et al, 2009). This empirical evidence from around the world, in contrasting economic conditions, shows that today's young students repeatedly prove to be a mixture of groups with various interests, motives, and behaviors, and never a single generational cohort with common characteristics.…”
Section: Empirical Research On Digital Natives and The Net Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%