2010
DOI: 10.1093/llc/fqq008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital documentation of oral discourse genres

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, the project recognizes that this view is still controversial, pending question that must be left for another occasion. Documentation, from its origins utilizing the first technology of the word centuries ago, continues to play an essential role in the preservation of indigenous languages and in particular the recording and dissemination of the verbal art forms closely associated with them (Mason, 2010). One of the uniquely productive features of the modern-day archive, as described by Mason, is the possibility of coding the poetic functions of the vast body of the popular aesthetic genres, recovering them for study from the practice of poetics in social life.…”
Section: Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, the project recognizes that this view is still controversial, pending question that must be left for another occasion. Documentation, from its origins utilizing the first technology of the word centuries ago, continues to play an essential role in the preservation of indigenous languages and in particular the recording and dissemination of the verbal art forms closely associated with them (Mason, 2010). One of the uniquely productive features of the modern-day archive, as described by Mason, is the possibility of coding the poetic functions of the vast body of the popular aesthetic genres, recovering them for study from the practice of poetics in social life.…”
Section: Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%