Digital Education in Health Professions: The Need for Overarching Evidence Synthesis

Abstract

Synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trials of digital health education poses some challenges. These include a lack of clear categorization of digital health education in the literature; constantly evolving concepts, pedagogies, or theories; and a multitude of methods, features, technologies, or delivery settings. The Digital Health Education Collaboration was established to evaluate the evidence on digital education in health professions; inform policymakers, educators, and students; and ultimately, change the way in which these professionals learn and are taught. The aim of this paper is to present the overarching methodology that we use to synthesize evidence across our digital health education reviews and to discuss challenges related to the process. For our research, we followed Cochrane recommendations for the conduct of systematic reviews; all reviews are reported according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidance. This included assembling experts in various digital health education fields; identifying gaps in the evidence base; formulating focused research questions, aims, and outcome measures; choosing appropriate search terms and databases; defining inclusion and exclusion criteria; running the searches jointly with librarians and information specialists; managing abstracts; retrieving full-text versions of papers; extracting and storing large datasets, critically appraising the quality of studies; analyzing data; discussing findings; drawing meaningful conclusions; and drafting research papers. The approach used for synthesizing evidence from digital health education trials is commonly regarded as the most rigorous benchmark for conducting systematic reviews. Although we acknowledge the presence of certain biases ingrained in the process, we have clearly highlighted and minimized those biases by strictly adhering to scientific rigor, methodological integrity, and standard operating procedures. This paper will be a valuable asset for researchers and methodologists undertaking systematic reviews in digital health education.

Mobile Digital Education for Health Professions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration

“…We adhered to the published protocol [14] and followed Cochrane methodology in every step of the review [22]. For a more detailed description of the methodology, please refer to the methodology paper by Car J et al [9].…”

“…Digital education is a broad construct describing a wide range of teaching and learning strategies that are exclusively based on the use of electronic media and devices as training, communication, and interaction tools [8]. The construct covers aspects that may pertain to educational approaches, concepts, methods and technologies [9]. Digital education facilitates distant learning, which may help address the shortage of health professionals and educators in settings with limited resources by reducing the constraints of time and geographic barriers to training.…”

“…We categorized digital education according to the mode of delivery of digital education intervention and the pedagogical methods. Digital education includes, but is not limited to, offline and online computer-based education, serious gaming and gamification, massive open online courses, virtual reality environments, augmented reality, virtual patient simulations, psychomotor skills trainers and mobile digital education (mLearning) among others [9]. Each of these types of digital education has its own specificities, advantages, limitations, and challenges.…”

Multilingual Global E-Learning Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes Curriculum for Front Line Health Care Providers in Resource-Limited Countries: Development Study

“…Recent prospective controlled randomized studies [ 17 ] evaluating the effects of e-learning versus traditional learning suggest that both online and offline e-learning are equivalent, and possibly even superior, to exclusively utilizing traditional learning; however, these studies have largely focused on preclinical medical students in Western societies.…”

Freedom of Master's Degree Students to Study in Health Curricula: Switching to Optimized Blended Learning as a Solution!

“…Blended learning based on flipped classroom is not an obstacle to learning or teaching at the Master's level [8]. Flipped classrooms are available both at Master's degrees and for medical training [5].…”