2014
DOI: 10.7238/a.v0i14.2408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital Feminicity: Predication and Measurement, Materialist Informatics and Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…New materialist ideas have much to add to the research of media technologies not only in the context of individual practice but also with regards to entrenched and often implicit societal networks of power through which they operate (Colman, 2014) (Coole, 2013), as people use technologies for many reasons; to participate in useful or enjoyable activities, to maintain social relationships, or because the idea corresponds with a specific notion of themselves, to name only a few. The diffractions that result from these processes emerge as new ways of formulating local identities, as new social and economic aspirations and as embodied, spatial and temporal knowledges capable of subverting other, more structured or formalized kinds of knowledge (Kenway & Hickey-Moody, 2011).…”
Section: Technologies As Double Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…New materialist ideas have much to add to the research of media technologies not only in the context of individual practice but also with regards to entrenched and often implicit societal networks of power through which they operate (Colman, 2014) (Coole, 2013), as people use technologies for many reasons; to participate in useful or enjoyable activities, to maintain social relationships, or because the idea corresponds with a specific notion of themselves, to name only a few. The diffractions that result from these processes emerge as new ways of formulating local identities, as new social and economic aspirations and as embodied, spatial and temporal knowledges capable of subverting other, more structured or formalized kinds of knowledge (Kenway & Hickey-Moody, 2011).…”
Section: Technologies As Double Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper aims to contribute to a growing field in which the materiality of technologies is front and centre; a materialist informatics (Colman, 2014;Nakamura, 2003), but also a digital materialist (Casemajor, 2015;Reichert & Richterich, 2015) way of thinking about the technologies that have become a crucial part of most people's everyday lives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interview becomes a political and feminist statement to a live, attentive audience. Coming from the feminist new materialist frame of interviewing and understanding feminist identities in the contexts with which they are made (Colman 2014;McTague et al 2017), we apply this concept to the new materialist trope that "every actual object is surrounded by a cloud of virtuality" (Hillis et al 2015, p. 9). This virtuality can be seen here in the intra-active engagements between layers of love heart emojis, black phone screens, sweating bodies, followers' comments, a flowing dress, and conversations about art.…”
Section: Mixing With Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…strand of monist minoritarian philosophy that helps to understand these currects changes. This paradigm is referred to as new materialism (van der Tuin, 2015;Dolphijn & van der Tuin, 2012;Rogowska-Stangret, 2017;Re vellesBenavente et al, 2014;Colman, 2014;Palmer, 2014). This paradigm has grown in between these fields of knowledge and encompases a transversal vision of knowledge that attempts to engage with the world through processes, relations, affects and intensities that push pre-established dualisms to the limits, producing instead affirmative critiques and dynamic methodologies that pursue queering linearities rather than static results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously stated, I cannot understand these three strands of material knowledges (new materialism, agential realism and feminist contemporary theory) apart from each other, which is the reason why I prevent the reader from finding an account of classificatory practices that provide similarities and differences between these two authors. I argue that understanding them diffractively provides a differing political methodology in order to engage with the (in)visible neo-liberal practices that structure unexhaustive hierarchies of power which hinder a feminist pursuit of "change" (Colman, 2014). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%