2016
DOI: 10.6090/jarq.50.241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital Filters to Eliminate or Separate Tidal Components in Groundwater Observation Time-Series Data

Abstract: This paper discusses digital low-pass filters for application to tidally fluctuated groundwater observation data. Three types of filters that are commonly used, mainly for oceanography, and newly produced filters are comparatively evaluated with a focus on their ability to eliminate major diurnal and semidiurnal tidal components. All the digital filters presented are the nonrecursive type that can easily be used with spreadsheet software. Newly produced low-pass filters are excellent tide-killer filters with a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Closer inspection of the NTR time series did reveal small oscillations at tidal frequencies. Low-pass filters designed to remove these components could be applied to the NTR time series (Shirahata et al, 2016), however, filters can easily decrease amplitude of the signal and care must be taken to not remove water level oscillations (e.g., surge) caused by TCs moving quickly through the region. Additionally, for TCs with durations of multiple tidal cycles, maximum NTR often occurs over low predicted tide, and not indicative of amount of flooding over the next (or previous) high tide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Closer inspection of the NTR time series did reveal small oscillations at tidal frequencies. Low-pass filters designed to remove these components could be applied to the NTR time series (Shirahata et al, 2016), however, filters can easily decrease amplitude of the signal and care must be taken to not remove water level oscillations (e.g., surge) caused by TCs moving quickly through the region. Additionally, for TCs with durations of multiple tidal cycles, maximum NTR often occurs over low predicted tide, and not indicative of amount of flooding over the next (or previous) high tide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent of groundwater fluctuations from tides are a result of the hydraulic connectivity and distance to the ocean (Ferris, 1951). Numerous methods exist to remove the periodic tidal signal, whereby a Godin filter is recommended by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (Pagendam & Percival, 2015; Shirahata et al., 2016; Walters & Heston, 1982). We therefore applied a Godin filter to the groundwater level data to smooth the signals using N = 24‐point (for ∆ t = 30 min) window to remove the semi‐diurnal tidal signal.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Groundwater and tidal data were inspected prior to analysis and no issues (e.g., gaps, spikes, steps) were found. Barometricpressure and precipitation data were examined using an automated evaluation and correction procedure by the data provider The low-pass finite-impulse-response filter, "LP241H079122kM3" from Shirahata et al (2016) was applied to groundwater and sea levels for comparison with regression deconvolution results. The filter uses a ten-day symmetric window designed to remove diurnal and semi-diurnal tidal constituents as well as their higher harmonics.…”
Section: Field Site Monitoring and Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%