2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.01.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital image correlation (DIC) for measurement of strains and displacements in coarse, low volume-fraction FRP composites used in civil infrastructure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The corresponding step size was 5. The strain was calculated result from the average displacement of a couple of adjacent calculation subsets, so the strain at the edge could not be determined [29,[34][35][36][37][38]. The tensile tests with the same loading conditions were repeated three times.…”
Section: Full-field Strain Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding step size was 5. The strain was calculated result from the average displacement of a couple of adjacent calculation subsets, so the strain at the edge could not be determined [29,[34][35][36][37][38]. The tensile tests with the same loading conditions were repeated three times.…”
Section: Full-field Strain Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digital image correlation (DIC), or Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV), has since its introduction in the 1980s evolved into one of the most versatile and widespread techniques in experimental mechanics [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Recent examples are found in diverse scientific fields such as biomechanics [7], infrastructure [8], material science [9], composite structures [10], and microfluidistics [11], but the technique is not restricted to these scientific fields. A quick search on a popular search engine lists over 50,000 contributions out of which 16,000 are published throughout the last four years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An actual testing coupon for the optical deformation measurement is shown in Figure 3b. All the set parameters for analysis of images was followed by Reference [25], therefore, the re-projection error caused by DSLR cameras was around 0.05 pixels, the displacement and strain difference were around 6% and 0.06%, respectively. More details regarding the level of error in the DIC method when in combination with inexpensive DSLR cameras can be found in the literature [24,25].…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%