2022 IEEE 2nd International Maghreb Meeting of the Conference on Sciences and Techniques of Automatic Control and Computer Engi 2022
DOI: 10.1109/mi-sta54861.2022.9837586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital Image Watermarking Method Based on LSB and DWT Hybrid Technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Classic methods can include methods, such as those based on the least significant bit [ 23 , 24 , 25 ] or methods based on frequency domain manipulation (discrete wavelet transform, discrete Fourier transform, discrete sine, and cosine transform) [ 10 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ]. There are many modifications of these methods, such as a combination of the least significant bit method and those based on manipulation of the frequency domain, which includes publications concerning hybrid domains [ 23 , 32 , 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classic methods can include methods, such as those based on the least significant bit [ 23 , 24 , 25 ] or methods based on frequency domain manipulation (discrete wavelet transform, discrete Fourier transform, discrete sine, and cosine transform) [ 10 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ]. There are many modifications of these methods, such as a combination of the least significant bit method and those based on manipulation of the frequency domain, which includes publications concerning hybrid domains [ 23 , 32 , 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, the disadvantage is that watermarking is not robust. Ghrare et al [10] proposed a hybrid watermarking technique based on Least Significant Bit (LSB) and DWT, which divides the watermarked image into two parts and embeds them into the spatial and transform domains, respectively. This technique is resistant to Gaussian noise and JPEG compression but is less robust to geometric attacks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transform domain watermarking is performed by adjusting the coefficients of the image transform domain for watermark embedding [13,14], and this type of algorithm has the characteristics of more complex operations, less information capacity, but high resistance to attacks. The commonly used transform domains are DCT [4,6,15,[18][19][20][21], DWT [1,3,5,10,[15][16][17]22], DFT (Discrete Fourier Transform) [18], SVD (Singular Value Decomposition) [16,17,21] etc. Using a single transform domain does not meet the needs of all watermarking algorithms simultaneously, and to compensate for each other's shortcomings, most existing algorithms use hybrid domain techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages and disadvantages of each scheme are used as inspiration to combine several transformations, or hybrids with new transformations to the scheme, or combined across different domains. For example, DCT with SVD scheme [39], DWT with SVD scheme [40], DWT with DCT scheme [41], SVD with Hadamard transform [42], DWT with LSB [43], SVD with DFT [44], DWT with DFT [45], SVD with SWT [46], SVD in spatial domain [47], hybrid SDV, DWT, and HVS [48], and many more hybrid image watermarking schemes. These hybrid examples show there are improvement opportunities to get better performances.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%