2020
DOI: 10.1080/14675986.2020.1747259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital learning across cultures: an account of activity theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The students also stated at the teleconferences that they had lost their prior excitement about distance learning because they had many tasks in different fields and separate platforms according to their teachers' preferences. While learners were aware of the digital dimension of their studying in the project, it appeared to some that communicating with the online tool solely was not the desired option (Guo et al, 2020). All these factors, along with the non-obligatory nature of ERT during this period, substantially affected their participation rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The students also stated at the teleconferences that they had lost their prior excitement about distance learning because they had many tasks in different fields and separate platforms according to their teachers' preferences. While learners were aware of the digital dimension of their studying in the project, it appeared to some that communicating with the online tool solely was not the desired option (Guo et al, 2020). All these factors, along with the non-obligatory nature of ERT during this period, substantially affected their participation rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Developing a pedagogically robust view of digital environments was central to this project, where the pedagogies drove the learning rather than digital tools shaping the learning experiences. The relationships and subsequent attitudes that people (students or teachers) form with digital learning and teaching has significant impact on learning and teaching experiences (Guo et al, 2020). Contemporary teaching and learning is therefore shaped by what can be considered digital learning ecologies or communities (Seely Brown, 2000).…”
Section: Digital Pedagogies and Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study uses Engeström's (1999) activity theory to understand how learners collaborate with the assistance of resources in 'a meaningful context which is called as activity' (Issroff & Scanlon, 2002, p. 78). Activity is a structure that involves analytical and conceptual elements, and it can be restructured by different units' encounters with each other and with unit of other activities in the entire process (Guo et al, 2020). Engeström (1999) presents seven related components in his activity theory, including subjects, tools, objects, rules, community, division of labour, and outcomes.…”
Section: Elements Shaping Learners' Collaborative Behavioursmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Engeström's conceptual framework of activity theory is illustrated in Figure 3. Besides guiding towards an understanding of the teaching and learning process, the activity theory also seeks to explain and impact qualitative changes in human practices while pertaining to accomplish tasks or fulfill school requirements (Guo et al, 2020). As shown in Figure 3, the relationship between subject (e.g., students, teachers, candidates) and object (e.g., raw materials, intended or unintended learning outcomes, or problems to be resolved) is mediated by tools (e.g., activities, assignments, learning platforms, methods, educational technologies, online collaboration tools), whereas the relationship between subject and community (e.g., students' families, school administrators, stakeholders) is mediated by rules (school regulations, classroom regulations, grading systems, academic requirements).…”
Section: Elements Shaping Learners' Collaborative Behavioursmentioning
confidence: 99%