Digital palpation of the pilot balloon vs. continuous manometry for controlling the intracuff pressure in laryngeal mask airways

Abstract

SummaryThis study compared two methods of controlling the intracuff pressure in laryngeal mask airways. One hundred and eighty patients were randomly assigned into two groups. In the first group (n = 90), after training, the intracuff pressure was controlled using digital palpation of the pilot balloon. In the second group (n = 90), continuous manometry was used to control the intracuff pressure. In the palpation group, 37% of patients experienced pharyngolaryngeal complications vs. 12% in the manometry group (p < 0.001). We conclude that the digital palpation technique is not a suitable alternative to manometry in controlling the intracuff pressure in laryngeal mask airways.

Spring recoil and supraglottic airway devices: lessons from the law of conservation of energy

“…Other solutions have been proposed, including SADs with an embedded cuff monitoring system, sustained by evidence that continuous cuff monitoring reduces oropharyngeal side effects [27], with similar reliability to an electronic manometer and largely better performance than (subjective) digital palpation [28] originally suggested by Dr. Brain.…”

Implications of the 2015 AAGBI recommendations for standards of monitoring during anaesthesia and recovery

“…A recent audit at the hospital of the lead author (MC) found that in > 40% of tracheal tubes and > 60% of supraglottic airways, cuff pressures were inflated above the manufacturer's recommended maxima, with ~30% inflated significantly above that level. Cuff pressure manometers are relatively inexpensive, so it would not require huge investment to introduce this simple improvement in practice .…”