Digital Rights as a New Object of Civil Rights: Issues of Substantive and Procedural Law

Rusakova, Ekaterina P.; Frolova, Evgenia E.; Gorbacheva, Anna I.

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-39319-9_74

Cited by 27 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It is necessary to note here that the science of civil procedural law draws attention to the importance of digital transformation of justice (Dudin et al, 2019;Inshakova et al, 2020;Kalinina et al, 2019;Rusakova et al, 2020). Thus, we can agree with the statement of Valeev and Nuriev (2019) about the lack of clear "indicators" of the development of economic justice in the context of digitalization.…”

Section: Research Questionssupporting

confidence: 61%

Securing The Information Infrastructure Of Economic Justice

Afanasyev¹

2022

European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article is devoted to the issues of ensuring the security of the information infrastructure of judicial proceedings in economic cases. The relevance of the research topic is caused by the development of digital technologies in the field of the activities of courts and other subjects of justice in economic disputes, as well as due to the need to establish legal ways to protect judicial information. In order to reveal the concept of "information structure of economic justice," a legal analysis of the Strategy for the Development of the Information Society in the Russian Federation for 2017-2030, the Concept of Informatization of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, as well as scientific works of Russian and foreign authors is given. It is stated that the information infrastructure of economic justice is a set of information judicial systems, hardware and software and communication networks that ensure the implementation of individual procedural actions, as well as the interaction of participants in the trial in electronic form. Based on the results of the study, the main directions of ensuring the security of the information infrastructure of economic justice are determined. It is concluded that these areas include ensuring (1) the security of information systems of judicial proceedings and record-keeping, as well as (2) the security of information contained in these systems. In addition, emphasis is placed on the usefulness of building a system that includes various legal ways to protect information that relates to the administration of economic justice.

show abstract

Section: Research Questionssupporting

confidence: 61%

Securing The Information Infrastructure Of Economic Justice

Afanasyev¹

2022

European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Such addressing was previously possible in the absence of an ongoing judicial or administrative review of the case. However, since January 1, 2015 the part 2 has lost its force (Rusakova et al, 2020), and currently there are no such restrictions on securing evidence, the courts accept notarized evidence, including electronic one, and evidence executed during a court case.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In turn, the attempt to implement classical approaches to the electronic specifics of social relations leads to the unreliability or irrelevance of digital evidence in the process of proving. The very essence of electronic evidence introduces its own peculiarity and requires specific technical guarantees to be legally fixed (Rusakova et al, 2020).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Providing electronic internet evidence in Russian notarial and judicial practice for civil law disputes

Kravchenko¹,

Ovchinnikov²,

Romanov³

et al. 2022

Rev. Invest. Univ. Quindío

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The current study is mainly devoted to the analysis of the current Russian legislation and the emerging notarial and judicial practice in the field of providing electronic evidence, the features and problems of procedures for their notarization, the relevance and admissibility of electronic evidence in civil law disputes in courts of general jurisdiction and arbitration courts as a factor in stabilizing civil law turnover carried out in information and communication formats (digital economy). Moreover, the study considers the problems of legal recording electronic traces while noting the most significant aspects of this recording of the evidence and formulating recommendations for notaries and parties to judicial disputes. To that aim, a range of general scientific methods, including observational, descriptive, and qualitative approaches, are used. Based on the results, the Russian regulatory system must have mechanisms for fixing traces of such civil activity to use them as evidence in civil and arbitration disputes.

show abstract

“…On the other hand, it is necessary to assume the "emergent effects" development from their interaction. We should consider the interaction and mutual influence of digital forms, biological factors, and socio-cultural dominants, together with their combined impact (an ontologically unique combination) on the formation of socio-political and socio-economic events (Frolova et al, 2020;Rusakova et al, 2020).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Main Development Trajectories Of "Biopolitics" And "Digital Politics" In The Digital Age

Mamychev¹

2022

The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper examines the leading trajectories in changing the socio-political and socio-economic life of modern societies that appeared due to digitalization and the global pandemic processes . The article discusses principal transformations both in socio-political practice and in political thought. Separately, the research analyzes the main models or strategic options for the developing "Biopolitics" and "Digital Politics" under the influence of either the digital transformation of society or a long-term viral pandemic. The authors identify and consider in detail: a service model focused on the expansion of digital medical services and population protection systems (digital health care and digital health protection), as well as the general introduction of electronic medical services (health services); a model of platform solutions focused on digital globalization, the formation of a universal health system, biosurveillance and biosecurity; 3) models of digital transhumanism and bioevolutionism, justifying the cardinal evolution of society, a human being, and all the traditional functioning systems; 4) the model of digital statism, which involves the digitalization of national structures, and the creation of sovereign mechanisms for their protection from various external and internal threats. The paper also substantiates that the variant of digital statism is most suitable to modern domestic and international realities and existing viral challenges and civilizational risks.

show abstract

Digital Rights as a New Object of Civil Rights: Issues of Substantive and Procedural Law

Cited by 27 publications

References 4 publications

Securing The Information Infrastructure Of Economic Justice

Securing The Information Infrastructure Of Economic Justice

Providing electronic internet evidence in Russian notarial and judicial practice for civil law disputes

Main Development Trajectories Of "Biopolitics" And "Digital Politics" In The Digital Age

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About