2019
DOI: 10.2217/3dp-2019-0013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital Transformation and 3D Printing of Transtibial Load-Bearing Prosthesis in India: Recent Advances, Challenges and Future Perspectives

Abstract: The field of rehabilitation and assistive technology has witnessed various approaches and changes in the course of its evolution. Traditional materials like wood or heavy metals have been replaced by resins and plastics. The need to deliver assistive devices has quickly resulted in the creation of new technologies like 3D printing and digital transformation, internet of things IoT. This article addresses the development of applying digital transformation and 3D printing techniques to produce socket designs for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have been conducted on incorporating AM into socket design and advancement to address the issues of a transtibial amputee. Because of the low cost of printing, FDM is a common fabrication technique for prosthesis sockets (Lu et al , 2009; Moulic et al , 2019; van der Stelt et al , 2021). Traditional transtibial prosthesis design and manufacturing time vary between 5 and 14 days, including measurements (one day), mold creation (one to three days), socket creation (two to six days), assembly, alignment, fitting and cosmetic finish (one to four days).…”
Section: Additive Manufacturing In Prosthesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have been conducted on incorporating AM into socket design and advancement to address the issues of a transtibial amputee. Because of the low cost of printing, FDM is a common fabrication technique for prosthesis sockets (Lu et al , 2009; Moulic et al , 2019; van der Stelt et al , 2021). Traditional transtibial prosthesis design and manufacturing time vary between 5 and 14 days, including measurements (one day), mold creation (one to three days), socket creation (two to six days), assembly, alignment, fitting and cosmetic finish (one to four days).…”
Section: Additive Manufacturing In Prosthesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last few years, the number of projects leveraging 3D printing for the production of assistive devices in LMICs have started to fourish but full research accounts of them are still rare [25,26,46,71]. Driven by the pioneering e-NABLE hand (http://enablingthefuture.org/), the large majority of these projects focus on the production of prosthetics and orthotics devices for both upper and lower limbs [63].…”
Section: D Printing Of Assistive Devices In Lmicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, authors in [46] described the development and fabrication of a lower limb prosthetic socket. Rather than designing the socket from scratch using a CAD software, the shape of the socket is closely matched to the shape of the stump of the person which is captured through a 3D scanner.…”
Section: D Printing Of Assistive Devices In Lmicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figura 1: Primera prótesis canina (3D-printer) (Zapata Saavedra, 2017) Por otra parte, la tecnología de deposición de material fundido o impresión 3D ha crecido enormemente en los últimos años, esto también en el campo de la fabricación de prótesis. En la actualidad se cuenta con técnicas, conocimientos y medios para que el tener una discapacidad no se vea afectado la vida cotidiana de los animales o personas (Ghosh, Hussain, Murthy, Khawade, & Singh, 2019). La implementación de esta tecnología está estrechamente relacionada a sus costos, estos son bajos en comparación a otros métodos de fabricación.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified