ACM SIGGRAPH 2018 Courses 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3214834.3214837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital typography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to typographers' views (P2, P4, P5, §3.2.2), our model found strong interaction efects between age and weight. In addition to the empirical validation provided by the model, the typographers and past research confrm that the anatomy of Georgia is designed for digital reading (P1, [58]) and that serifs may help older participants more easily distinguish characters [1,59,76]. Our recommendation for this age group may be an overgeneralization because of the skewed age distribution of the participants.…”
Section: Fontmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to typographers' views (P2, P4, P5, §3.2.2), our model found strong interaction efects between age and weight. In addition to the empirical validation provided by the model, the typographers and past research confrm that the anatomy of Georgia is designed for digital reading (P1, [58]) and that serifs may help older participants more easily distinguish characters [1,59,76]. Our recommendation for this age group may be an overgeneralization because of the skewed age distribution of the participants.…”
Section: Fontmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Our methods to measure font familiarity may be sub-optimal, thus explaining its inconsistent effect on reading speed in our results ( §6.2.2). It relies on participants' varying abilities to recognize fonts and judge their familiarity based on examples [1,59,62,76]. Future research could develop more reliable methods to measure font familiarity over time and account for participants' prior habits and experiences with fonts.…”
Section: Self-assessed Reader Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%