2011
DOI: 10.1177/0309324711409999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital volume correlation analyses of synchrotron tomographic images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extended FE simulations were validated against experimentally measured displacement fields via extended DVC by comparing measured and predicted profiles of stress intensity factors [185,189]. Crack opening displacements measured via DVC were compared to predictions by FE analyses for a test with a chevron notched sample made of polygranular graphite to validate a cohesive zone model [160].…”
Section: Identification and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extended FE simulations were validated against experimentally measured displacement fields via extended DVC by comparing measured and predicted profiles of stress intensity factors [185,189]. Crack opening displacements measured via DVC were compared to predictions by FE analyses for a test with a chevron notched sample made of polygranular graphite to validate a cohesive zone model [160].…”
Section: Identification and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the correlation residual eld is extremely useful to decide on the choice of acceptable parameters. The latter shows how good or bad the registration is spatially, and possible ill-behaviors appear generally very clearly [11,13,14,15,46,47].…”
Section: Correlation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five tomographic scans were acquired from a tensile test along the longitudinal axis [45], where the applied load was equal to 22 (reference), 150, 200, 250 and 273 N. The mean longitudinal strains were measured using the GA-DVC algorithm with an element size of 16 voxels from which a stress-strain curve of the specimen (cross section: 1.6 × 0.8 mm…”
Section: Reliability and Accuracy Of The Displacement Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%