Digitalization: public opinion landscapes (on the example of Russia)

Kamensky, Evgeny; Grimov, Oleg

doi:10.21003/ea.v180-06

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The risk management methodology involves a joint analysis and systematization of approaches to management and risk forecasting and allows considering these processes as one of the most important elements of the socio-technical landscape of digital reality (V. I. Arshinov, V. G. Budanov, I. A. Aseeva, N. A. Korenevsky and others), the coordinates of which are: living conditions, the significance of life, self-assessment of vital activity (Kamensky & Grimov, 2019;Budanov & Aseeva, 2019).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk management of sociocultural process: digital revolution

Mayakova¹

2020

EA-XXI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Risks and threats play an important role in the development of the sociocultural sphere, while risk management makes it possible to identify and predict them. In this regard, it is relevant, expedient and necessary to undertake an attempt to adapt the economic methodology of risk management to the sociocultural process by means of socio-humanitarian revision of risk management and the formation of an integrated model of sociocultural risk management based on the relevant methodology. Such a model will provide an opportunity for a more detailed approach to the process of assessing and controlling the occurrence of risk, as well as increasing the predictability of potential risk based on the accumulated scientific and practical knowledge and previous experience. The approach to the problem proposed by the author will expand the theoretical and methodological base not only of socio-humanitarian science, but also innovation, general management theory and the risk management methodology itself. The purpose of the paper is to define the specifics and main trends of risk management in relation to the sociocultural process, as well as assess the possibilities of applying this methodology for managing and preventing sociocultural risks. Basing on sociocultural and interdisciplinary approaches, risk management techniques, crisis concepts and the socio-technical landscape of digital reality, an integrated risk management model was formed in relation to the socio-cultural process. It will create an effective mechanism for predicting risk and reducing its impact on the sociocultural process, focused on solving the problems of stabilization and development of objects and processes, and can also be used as a tool in the procedure for making and implementing decisions in strategic planning and project management. Based on the results of this study, a set of main trends in risk management will be formulated in relation to the sociocultural process. The authors of the paper consider the possibilities of using this methodology for managing and preventing sociocultural risks and form an integrated model of risk management in relation to the sociocultural process in the context of a digital revolution.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk management of sociocultural process: digital revolution

Mayakova¹

2020

EA-XXI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A distinctive feature of the 21st century, marked by the advent of the era of information technology, has influenced the increasing importance of the use of digital systems and the digitalization of certain areas of public life in general. The question of the role and impact of the digitalization of modern society was reflected in the works of such researchers as Dremliuga et al (2019aDremliuga et al ( , 2019b, Bachilo and Shmakov (2017), Volodenkov (2017), Herrmann (2020), Kamensky and Grimov (2019), Bocharnikov & Chemezov (2020), Khomyakova (2019) and other authors (Baranov et al, 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Herrmann (2020) As part of the research, he analyzes the harmful effects of digitalization on social development, based on such shortcomings as "confusion between the technical dimension of digitalization and its application as a definition of business models and the assumption of a reasonable socio-economic norm that never actually existed" (p. 120). Kamensky and Grimov (2019) define and describe indicators of public reflection on the problems of digitalization, as well as possible landscapes of digital reality, indicating that within the framework of the implementation of new landscapes it will be important to take into account "the balance of non-human and human subjectivity so that a person does not become an appendage of technology and not only supports but also develops his creative and intellectual potential in addition to competition in the global digital economy" (p. 4857). Bocharnikov and Chemezov (2020) conduct a study of the problems and priorities of digitalization policy, analyzing the processes of implementation of digitalization of the economy and other spheres of public relations in Russia, as well as considering the successful experience of foreign countries in the area studied by the authors.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Approaches To The Definition Of The Term "Digitalization"

Katrin¹

2022

The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article analyzes various approaches to the definition of the term "digitalization", examines the problems of the role, influence and significance of the digitalization process in modern society, examines the position of the authors of scientific papers on this problem, as well as individual elements, characteristics and goals of this process. In order to solve this issue, general theoretical methods were used -analysis, comparison, generalization of the researchers works to determine the meaning of the term "digitalization" in various directions of the influence of the phenomenon under consideration. At the same time, in order to study the relevance of the problem posed by this work, the analysis of scientific positions on the significance and impact of digitalization on certain spheres of public life has been carried out. Based on the results of the study, the author identifies individual approaches, highlights distinctive features, and also proposes an author's approach to defining the term "digitalization", formulates a conclusion about the role and significance of the digitalization process in the 21st century in the life of individual citizens and society as a whole. Thus, within the framework of the study, its goal and objectives have been achieved -the study and analysis of approaches to the definition of the concept of "digitalization", as well as the comparison and generalization of the positions of researchers on this issue, the criteria for the phenomenon under consideration have been established.

show abstract

University 4.0: Contours of Post-Industrial Manifestations In The Optics Of The Triple Helix Model

Kamensky,

Mayakova,

Ogurtsova

et al. 2024

jour

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Relevance. Universities, as institutional organizations, are subject to the greatest reform in the transforming matrix of goals, values and norms of building the Future. In this regard, the problem of conceptualizing the ultra-new model of the University of the fourth generation (4.0) is the most relevant for science and social sciences.The purpose of this study is to consider and analyze the conceptual foundations reflected in the scientific manifestations of the formation of the fourth generation University model (4.0) as a subject of the “triple helix".Objectives. To analyze the concepts, ideologems and other units of the theoretical basis of the University 4.0 model presented in the scientific media space; to reflect the emerging concept of University 4.0 in the optics of the “triple helix” model, implemented in the context of the formation of a post-industrial society.Methodology. The study was carried out on the basis of synergetic principles of complexity theory, general provisions of system theory and interinstitutional and transinstitutional communication using system-structural and convergent network methods.Results. Today, new ontological continuums of social multi-subject practices are objectively “unfolding” based on the ethics of subjective integration and synergy of individual and collective, as well as machine and hybrid intelligences. Flexible models of collective management of the future should be synthesized on such university cognitive platforms 4.0, where even transinstitutional forms of relations, such as the “triple helix”, begin to be perceived as tools, rather than platforms for the implementation of new ideas and solutions that overcome historical and cultural predestination. The platform of the “cognitive turn of postindustriality” is the Universities of the fourth generation.Conclusions. The platform of the "cognitive turn of postindustriality" in the future is the Universities of the fourth generation. Then, in university activities, existing traditional subject (for example, institutional) ontologies act only as a tool for generating on their basis “packages” of understanding posteconomics in the spirit of “meta-subject forms of thinking”, such as collective, including hybrid human-machine intelligence. New ethics (bio-, techno-, etc.) are also being institutionalized and progressing.

show abstract

Digitalization: public opinion landscapes (on the example of Russia)

Cited by 3 publications

References 5 publications

Risk management of sociocultural process: digital revolution

Risk management of sociocultural process: digital revolution

Approaches To The Definition Of The Term "Digitalization"

University 4.0: Contours of Post-Industrial Manifestations In The Optics Of The Triple Helix Model

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About