IET 11th International Conference on Ionospheric Radio Systems and Techniques (IRST 2009) 2009
DOI: 10.1049/cp.2009.0037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digitally-modulated HF communications reliability: modifications to ITU-R Rec. P.533 propagation model and the associated computer program REC533

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The computer program makes use of the REC533 developed by the Institute of Telecommunications Science (ITS) that supports ITU-R P.533 [5][6]. The goal of frequency prediction is to obtain the frequency of optimum(FOT) under actual communication time.…”
Section: Model Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computer program makes use of the REC533 developed by the Institute of Telecommunications Science (ITS) that supports ITU-R P.533 [5][6]. The goal of frequency prediction is to obtain the frequency of optimum(FOT) under actual communication time.…”
Section: Model Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these methods have some limitations, e.g., they only include the effect of specular reflections, only three hops from each ionospheric layer are calculated, and the underlying databases are monthly and hourly in nature, so predictions cannot be made for individual days. The ITU‐R have published a method of calculating the delay spread using such prediction techniques [see ITU‐R , 2007; Barclay et al , 2009] and this has been incorporated in the software package REC533 (now called ITUHFPROP), but not VOACAP, available from the Institute for Telecommunications Services (ITS) website (elbert.its.bldrdoc.gov). However, this implementation is based on using the median signal power or signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR), which, as will be demonstrated in this paper, can often lead to incorrectly predicted values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent paper [ Stocker and Warrington , 2011a, 2011b] presented a ‘brute force’ method of calculating ITU‐R multipath spread (IMPS) [ ITU‐R , 2007; Barclay et al , 2009] from VOACAP predictions that included the effect of the SNR probability density functions (pdf). The predictions of spread were compared with observations obtained over several sub‐auroral paths with generally good agreement at sunspot minimum, but poorer performance at sunspot maximum because the presence (or otherwise) of high order modes (e.g., 3F2) is not well predicted by VOACAP at that time for these paths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements are first presented for a path from Uppsala‐Leicester during sunspot maximum, second for the same path, but at solar minimum, and lastly for a slightly longer path (Nurmijärvi‐Leicester) also at solar minimum. The predictions of delay spread are based on the definition recently introduced by the International Telecommunication Union Radiocommunication Sector (ITU‐R) [ ITU‐R , 2007; Barclay et al , 2009] although VOACAP [ Lane , 2001] is used rather than ITU‐R [2009]. The results given here form the first systematic comparison between predicted and experimental values of the new delay spread parameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%