2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-015-7883-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digitisation of a moving assembly operation using multiple depth imaging sensors

Abstract: Several manufacturing operations continue to be manual even in today's highly automated industry because the complexity of such operations makes them heavily reliant on human skills, intellect and experience. This work aims to aid the automation of one such operation, the wheel loading operation on the trim and final moving assembly line in automotive production. It proposes a new method that uses multiple low-cost depth imaging sensors, commonly used in gaming, to acquire and digitise key shopfloor data assoc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum error margin of 2.78 mm in motion tracking and 1.46 mm in alignment feature position measurement are well within the industry standard tolerance of 4 mm (for the wheel and wheel hub type chosen). 23 The proposed DSS only takes this input data from the Kinect sensors and based on pre-defined expert rules, produces logical decisions in real-time for the different phases of the operation. Therefore, the proposed DSS is applicable in real-life vehicle assembly, but rigorous experimentation to establish validity on the actual assembly floor is required before industry adoption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The maximum error margin of 2.78 mm in motion tracking and 1.46 mm in alignment feature position measurement are well within the industry standard tolerance of 4 mm (for the wheel and wheel hub type chosen). 23 The proposed DSS only takes this input data from the Kinect sensors and based on pre-defined expert rules, produces logical decisions in real-time for the different phases of the operation. Therefore, the proposed DSS is applicable in real-life vehicle assembly, but rigorous experimentation to establish validity on the actual assembly floor is required before industry adoption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6 shows the operation setup and Figure 7 shows the outcome of alignment feature recognition and measurement of wheel hub motion characteristics for a sinusoidal up-down simulated deviation. The complete details of the experiment are reported in Prabhu et al 23 and summary of data used by the DSS for the wheel loading operation is summarised in Table 2.…”
Section: Data Inputmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In terms of 2D techniques the work of Matas and Obdržálek (2004) appears to be robust as it is able to deal with occlusions, in addition the work of Gupta et al (2014) is insightful as it provides approaches for object contour recognition and data sets creation. The work of Prabhu et al (2015) outlines a method to enable the tracking of the progress of a manual wheel assembly process.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identification of tasks being executed by human operators and validation of the assembly progress. Recent research has mainly focused on tracking the position and posture [19] and even fewer approaches perform intention prediction [20,21]. This work advances further by exploiting human and environment tracking to identify the workflow execution status which allows for the triggering of task-optimized support strategies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%