2021
DOI: 10.52462/jlls.29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diglossic features of the Arabic-speaking community in Australia: The influences of age, education, and prestige

Abstract: Diglossia is a language situation that does not always take place between two dialects of the same language; speaking two different languages in two different encounters is also considered diglossia. This study examines the use of language among Arabic-speaking Australians in Sydney. After analyzing ten authentic doctor-patient examination sessions in a clinic in Sydney, this study reveals that Arabic-speaking Australians are diglossic as they speak Modern Standard Arabic (MSA), Reginal Arabic Dialects (RADs),… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Politeness theory was used in a large number of studies to investigate politeness/impoliteness (Abel, 2003;Eelen, 2001;Haugh, 2007;Locher, 2012). It was used to examine politeness/impoliteness in workplace context (AlAfnan, 2014(AlAfnan, , 2015(AlAfnan, , 2018, workplace email (AlAfnan, 2021a(AlAfnan, , 2021b, interlingual requests (Al-Amri, 2011), apology (Yeganeh 2012), swearing (Abdel-Jawad, 2000, and even research papers (Getkham, 2014). AlAfnan (2022) used politeness theory to investigate politeness in a nonverbal communication context.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Politeness theory was used in a large number of studies to investigate politeness/impoliteness (Abel, 2003;Eelen, 2001;Haugh, 2007;Locher, 2012). It was used to examine politeness/impoliteness in workplace context (AlAfnan, 2014(AlAfnan, , 2015(AlAfnan, , 2018, workplace email (AlAfnan, 2021a(AlAfnan, , 2021b, interlingual requests (Al-Amri, 2011), apology (Yeganeh 2012), swearing (Abdel-Jawad, 2000, and even research papers (Getkham, 2014). AlAfnan (2022) used politeness theory to investigate politeness in a nonverbal communication context.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It includes communicators' presuppositions, their knowledge of the world around them, and their knowledge of each other (AlAfnan, 2022a, 2022b, Bayat, 2012. It further takes the analysis into what knowledge was taken into consideration in these communicative events and what elements of knowledge were left out or ignored (AlAfnan, 2021a). In this analysis, the intentions of speakers are an integral part of the analysis as it assists in providing an in-depth understanding of communicative events (AlAfnan, 2015(AlAfnan, , 2021b.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Speech act theory was used in various studies to examine language as social action (Ackerman, 1979, Akinwotu, 2013, Altikiri, 2011. It was used to examine requests, politeness, apologies (AlAfnan, 2022, 2021a, Bardovi-Harlig, 2012, Nureddeen, 2008, inaugural speeches (Putri, 2018), defamation texts (Sholihatin, 2020), and language learning settings (Budiasih et al, 2016). Even though some studies focused on examining the use of speech acts in political discourse, they mainly focused on presidential speeches where motivation, persuasion, and possible political gains are intended.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Just like politeness theory (Brown and Levinson, 1987), stylistics (Halliday, 1978), register (AlAfnan, 2015Halliday and Hasan, 1976) and implicature (Grice, 1975), it is rooted in pragmatics. It examines text in context to find out more about the force (AlAfnan, 2021a(AlAfnan, , 2021b. Speech acts, according to Yule (1996), are the smallest linguistic unit of communication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%