1973
DOI: 10.1021/bi00727a002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dihydrofolate reductases of Escherichia coli and bacteriophage T4. Spectrofluorometric study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
2

Year Published

1976
1976
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
13
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The formation of binary complexes between the enzyme and a variety of substrates and inhibitors can Table 5 is comparable with the values found for the enzyme from E. coli (2.4 x 106M-1, Erickson & Mathews, 1973; 9 x 105 M-1, Greenfield et al, 1972), T4 phage (2.0x 106M-1; Erickson & Mathews, 1973) and L1210 lymphoma (5.Ox 106M-1; Perkins & Bertino, 1966). NADPH 1976 appears to bind appreciably more tightly to the L. casei enzyme than to these other enzymes, for which binding constants in the range 1.3 x 106-2 x 107 M-1 were reported.…”
Section: Binding Ofsubstrates and Inhibitorssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The formation of binary complexes between the enzyme and a variety of substrates and inhibitors can Table 5 is comparable with the values found for the enzyme from E. coli (2.4 x 106M-1, Erickson & Mathews, 1973; 9 x 105 M-1, Greenfield et al, 1972), T4 phage (2.0x 106M-1; Erickson & Mathews, 1973) and L1210 lymphoma (5.Ox 106M-1; Perkins & Bertino, 1966). NADPH 1976 appears to bind appreciably more tightly to the L. casei enzyme than to these other enzymes, for which binding constants in the range 1.3 x 106-2 x 107 M-1 were reported.…”
Section: Binding Ofsubstrates and Inhibitorssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In addition, the two enzymes differ in their activity towards folate (see below). It seems likely that these differences can be attributed to the different strains of bacteria used; similar differences have been noted for the dihydrofolate reductases from different strains of E. coli (Mathews & Sutherland, 1965;Burchall & Hitchings, 1965;Burchall & Chan, 1969;Poe et al, 1972;Erickson & Mathews, 1973) and S. faecalis (see, for example, Albrecht & Hutchinson, 1969;D'Souza et al, 1972).…”
Section: Enzyme Assaymentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This value of approx. 21000 is in contrast with values of 17000 for DHFR from an MTX-resistant strain of E. coli (Poe et al, 1972) and 17800 for DHFR from a TMP-resistant strain of E. coli (Baccanari et al, 1975) among others (Mathews & Sutherland, 1965;Burchall & Hitchings, 1965;Erickson & Mathews, 1973). It seems that the differences can be ascribed to the different bacterial strains used, similar differences having been noted for DHFR from different strains of L.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Binding of a cation in the active site of acetylcholine esterase appears to be responsible for a pK a shift that is observed experimentally but not in electrostatic calculations (Wlodek et al, 1995). DHFR is known to be inhibited by ions (Poe et al, 1972;Erickson & Mathews, 1973;Baccanari et al, 1975), and the buffer used in the NMR studies contained 100 mM potassium phosphate. However, given that the pK a of MTX appears to be shifted even when MTX and the cofactor NADP are bound, this phenomenon seems less likely in this case.…”
Section: Inhibitor Binding: Salt-bridge or Neutral Polar Interaction?mentioning
confidence: 99%