2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2020.110013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dilatancy in dry granular flows with a compressible μ(I) rheology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental data show that the passage of the flow front at a given point is followed by a short under-pressure phase and a later and longer over-pressure phase. Roche et al (2010) propose that the under-pressure stage is mainly caused by the basal slip boundary condition and possibly by dilatancy processes (Garres-Díaz et al 2020;Bouchut et al 2021), which is supported by simulations (Breard et al 2019a). Moreover, the minimum value reached during the under-pressure phase was empirically correlated to the slip velocity (𝑢 slip ; Roche 2012).…”
Section: Simulations On Horizontal Planesmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The experimental data show that the passage of the flow front at a given point is followed by a short under-pressure phase and a later and longer over-pressure phase. Roche et al (2010) propose that the under-pressure stage is mainly caused by the basal slip boundary condition and possibly by dilatancy processes (Garres-Díaz et al 2020;Bouchut et al 2021), which is supported by simulations (Breard et al 2019a). Moreover, the minimum value reached during the under-pressure phase was empirically correlated to the slip velocity (𝑢 slip ; Roche 2012).…”
Section: Simulations On Horizontal Planesmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…We show that the relationship between distance along the channel and the maximum pressure reached during the flow passage is remarkably similar in simulations and experiments, which indicates that our model is able to capture reasonably well the evolution of pore pressure within the granular flow. This suggests that the effect of compaction and dilatancy processes (Bouchut et al 2016(Bouchut et al , 2021 is limited once the flow front has passed, and that the pore pressure effect in the propagation of granular flows can be modeled considering only advection. Moreover, we show that the magnitude of the under-pressure phase measured in experiments can be successfully quantified by considering the slip velocity at the channel base, as proposed by Breard et al (2019a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, it is worth highlighting that our model considers a constant pore pressure diffusion coefficient, which may not reflect correctly the behavior of fluidized flows in nature due to a series of factors such as dilatancy and compaction [30,31], which should be considered in future studies to deepen our understanding about the relationship between pore pressure diffusion in granular flows and their dimensions.…”
Section: Relationship Between Pore Pressure Diffusion Coefficient And...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluidization is the result of the differential motion between solid particles and interstitial gas, whose interplay is able to generate pore pressure, counterbalance partially or entirely the solid particle weight, and thus reduce particle friction [17,[19][20][21][22][23][24]. In the context of PDCs, fluidization is mainly generated at the impact zone of a collapsing fountain [25][26][27][28], while the temporal evolution of fluidization is the result of the coupled effect of diffusion, advection, dilatancy, compaction and air entrainment [29][30][31], which are strongly influenced by the grain-size distribution of the solid particles [18,32] and the underlying topography [11,33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roux & Radjai 1997;Rondon et al 2011;Pailha & Pouliquen 2009;Bouchut et al 2016aBouchut et al ,b, 2021. This compressibility impacts the shape and velocity of the flow and thus may be a source of error when not accounted for in numerical models, especially for granular flows under water (Rondon et al 2011;Bouchut et al 2021;Rauter 2021). We quantify these effects here to better interpret the comparison between incompressible codes and experimental results and therefore discriminate the origins of the error.…”
Section: Dilatation Of the Granular Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%