Dilemas na implementação da Convenção-Quadro para o Controle do Tabaco da Organização Mundial da Saúde

Borges, Luciana Correia Lima de Faria; Menezes, Henrique Zeferino de; Souza, Ielbo Marcus Lobo de

doi:10.1590/0102-311x00136919

Cited by 7 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This includes drawing on the experience of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), the first and only international public health treaty, which has been signed and ratified by more than 150 countries. 58 The FCTC helps regulate the political and marketing practices of the tobacco companies, and FCTC Article 5.3 specifically removes tobacco companies as stakeholders in the decision-making process, thereby diminishing their influence in protecting public health. This also includes drawing on the Framework Convention on Global Health, which is drafted as a global health treaty based on the right to health to establish national and global health equity.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

More Pain, More Gain! The Delivery of COVID-19 Vaccines and the Pharmaceutical Industry’s Role in Widening the Access Gap

Borges

Menezes

Crosbie

2022

Int J Health Policy Manag

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: An effective response to the COVID-19 pandemic entails a comprehensive strategy that ensures equitable access to all COVID-19-fighting technologies. To achieve this goal, the international community has acknowledged immunization as a public good. However, a trend of grossly unequal dose distribution emerged, owing, among other factors, to pharmaceutical companies' profit-driven actions, jeopardizing the mechanisms built to increase vaccine access. The contradiction between public health interests and corporate discretion in determining vaccine dose distribution poses critical concerns about the health risks associated with lengthening the duration of the pandemic and the eventual liability of companies for violations of human rights. Methods: To evaluate the risks posed to the COVID-19 immunization program, data on vaccine allocation and delivery, vaccine dose application, immunized populations, and the volume of Advanced Purchase Agreements (APAs) between countries and pharmaceutical companies were compiled and assessed. A descriptive analysis was then conducted to analyze the role of pharmaceutical companies in providing equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines. Results: When the data is broken down by income (as of June 2021), it shows that high-income countries have already crossed the COVAX 20% immunization threshold. However, countries of all other income levels have yet to achieve this mark for fully vaccinated people. Upper-middle-income countries have approximately 3%, low-and-middle-income countries have approximately 2% and low-income countries have less than 0.1% of fully vaccinated people per hundred. The supply shortage is expected to last until the second half of 2021. Conclusion: As a result of the COVAX failure, a health gap emerged with countries living in a pre-immunization period for an extended time. The existing conflict between the international response to tackle COVID-19 and corporate profit-driven behavior contributed to prolonging pandemic, especially in Africa. Accordingly, there is a need to approve an international treaty that targets the activities of all actors, including the pharmaceutical companies, in protecting human rights and the right to health realms.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

More Pain, More Gain! The Delivery of COVID-19 Vaccines and the Pharmaceutical Industry’s Role in Widening the Access Gap

Borges

Menezes

Crosbie

2022

Int J Health Policy Manag

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…O Brasil foi um dos protagonistas deste processo 18 . Apesar da ampla adesão, da especificidade e da relevância de sua pauta, a CQCT enfrenta desafios para garantir a efetiva aplicação de seus dispositivos 19 .…”

Section: A Origem Da Proposta De Regulação Internacional Das Pandemiasunclassified

A proposta de convenção internacional sobre a resposta às pandemias: em defesa de um tratado de direitos humanos para o campo da saúde global

Viegas

Ventura

2022

Cad. Saúde Pública

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Em novembro de 2021, a Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS) deu início à negociação de uma convenção, acordo ou outro instrumento internacional sobre a resposta às pandemias. Neste ensaio, defendemos e justificamos a tese de que o novo pacto deve ser um tratado de direitos humanos, como condição indispensável para a prevenção de novas pandemias e eficiência da resposta global quando elas ocorrem. Após o breve resgate da origem das negociações, apresentamos os principais conteúdos normativos que correspondem a um enfoque de direitos humanos: a instituição da regra de indissociabilidade entre medidas quarentenárias e de proteção social; e a regulamentação do acesso a tecnologias farmacêuticas. A seguir, em seção dedicada ao tema da efetividade do futuro tratado, classificamos as propostas existentes em ajustes tecnocráticos, como alterações no procedimento de declaração de emergências; mecanismos de transparência e controle, a exemplo da adoção de um mecanismo de Revisão Periódica Universal (RPU), similar ao do Conselho de Direitos Humanos das Nações Unidas, para monitorar obrigações dos Estados relacionadas à saúde; poderes coercitivos que seriam outorgados à OMS ou outra agência, tais como inspeções nos territórios nacionais realizadas por cientistas independentes; e mecanismos de coordenação política, como a criação de um Conselho Global de Ameaças à Saúde. Concluímos que há risco de adoção de um sistema mais eficiente de vigilância para alertar o mundo desenvolvido sobre ameaças oriundas de países em desenvolvimento, em lugar de um tratado capaz de contribuir para evitar que populações mais vulneráveis continuem sendo devastadas por pandemias cada vez mais frequentes.

show abstract

“…One goal of this study is to contribute to improvement in tobacco control interventions in reducing health disparities (figure 1). Efforts to promote effective tobacco control Open access reflect commitments to social justice 51 and implementation science can substantially improve the outcomes of these efforts. We will document the equity-orientation of included studies with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-Equity Extension checklist.…”

Section: Ethics and Disseminationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Use of implementation science in tobacco control intervention studies in the USA between 2000 and 2020: a scoping review protocol

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionDespite continuing efforts to reduce tobacco use in the USA, decline in smoking rates have stalled and smoking remains a major contributor to preventable death. Implementation science could potentially improve uptake and impact of evidence-based tobacco control interventions; however, no previous studies have systematically examined how implementation science has been used in this field. Our scoping review will describe the use of implementation science in tobacco control in the USA, identify relevant gaps in research and suggest future directions for implementation science application to tobacco control.Methods and analysisOur team, including a medical research librarian, will conduct a scoping review guided primarily by Arksey and O’Malley’s methodology. We will search English language peer-reviewed literature published from 2000 to 31 December 2020 for terms synonymous with ‘tobacco use’, ‘prevention’, ‘cessation’ and ‘implementation science’. The databases included in this search are MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (ProQuest), ERIC (ProQuest) and the Cochrane Library (Wiley). We will include cohort and quasi-experimental studies, single-group experiments and randomised trials that report qualitative and/or quantitative data related to applying implementation science to the planning and/or delivery of interventions to prevent or decrease the use of tobacco products. Studies must target potential or active tobacco users, intervention providers such as educators or healthcare professionals, or US policy-makers. A minimum of two reviewers will independently examine each title and abstract for relevance, and each eligible full text for inclusion and analysis. Use of implementation science, demonstrated by explicit reference to implementation frameworks, strategies or outcomes, will be extracted from included studies and summarised.Ethics and disseminationThis study is exempt from ethics board approval. We will document the equity-orientation of included studies with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Equity Extension checklist. Results will be submitted for conferences and peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberOpen Science Framework Registry (6YRK8).

show abstract

Dilemas na implementação da Convenção-Quadro para o Controle do Tabaco da Organização Mundial da Saúde

Cited by 7 publications

References 22 publications

More Pain, More Gain! The Delivery of COVID-19 Vaccines and the Pharmaceutical Industry’s Role in Widening the Access Gap

More Pain, More Gain! The Delivery of COVID-19 Vaccines and the Pharmaceutical Industry’s Role in Widening the Access Gap

A proposta de convenção internacional sobre a resposta às pandemias: em defesa de um tratado de direitos humanos para o campo da saúde global

Use of implementation science in tobacco control intervention studies in the USA between 2000 and 2020: a scoping review protocol

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About