2017
DOI: 10.20999/nam.2017.a001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dilution of Accountability and Transparency in the Flint Water Crisis: A Case of Institutional Implosion

Abstract: This article examines two major institutions widely touted in the United States as servants to communities and the general public: the government and the news media. The Flint water crisis is a textbook case in which these two institutions failed to live up to their responsibilities of accountability and transparency. The authors examine the major events during the water crisis, looking at it through the lens of government actions and how the press covered them, conducting qualitative context analysis during t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the Flint water crisis resulted in criminal and civil charges, which are still pending and increasing. The media's response to this problem is to present the topic of the water crisis first and foremost as a governance issue involving accountability, transparency, and asking the Michigan government to respond more quickly as part of its emergency response work (Chavez et al, 2017).…”
Section: B Literature Review 1 Digital Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the Flint water crisis resulted in criminal and civil charges, which are still pending and increasing. The media's response to this problem is to present the topic of the water crisis first and foremost as a governance issue involving accountability, transparency, and asking the Michigan government to respond more quickly as part of its emergency response work (Chavez et al, 2017).…”
Section: B Literature Review 1 Digital Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failure to represent community voices is a systemic problem within journalism norms and is perpetuated, in part, by journalism schools, when coursework emphasizes the importance of official sources to provide credibility (Wahl-Jorgensen & Hanitzsch, 2009). Such source reliance is shown to marginalize community voices and can have serious consequences when concerns of community members are left unaddressed (Boyle et al, 2012; Chavez et al, 2017). Establishing relationships with community members plays an essential role in generating representative sources, as community members feel more comfortable discussing issues with reporters they consider trustworthy (Ford et al, 2020).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most significant findings was that there is an ongoing lack of communication with the community and government officials. One issue that needs to be addressed is the "Watchdog Media" as explained in an article by Chavez, Perez, Tunney, & Nunez (2017). Simply stated is the need for information that is being reported to governmental officials should be given to the public.…”
Section: Making Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could have been avoided with oversight. "The case of the water crisis in Flint, Michigan, may demonstrate failures in the both the media watchdog function and governmental institutions over the period leading up to the exposure of lead leaching into the homes of the city's water" (Chavez et al 2017). The FWTF addressed the City of Flint as indicated in Table 8.…”
Section: Making Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%