2022
DOI: 10.1109/ojap.2022.3166633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimension and Sampling of the Near-Field and Its Intensity Over Curves

Abstract: The paper addresses the question of efficiently sampling the near field and its intensity over an arbitrary curved line. It aims at finding the minimum number of measurements and their position for discretizing the near field and its square amplitude without loss of information and follows a common approach for both the radiation operator and the correspondent lifting operator. A scalar geometry is examined for both electric and magnetic current sources. At first, the singular values of the radiation / lifting… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 54 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the uniform field sampling method, the nonuniform sampling method has a higher source reconstruction accuracy. Furthermore, reference [23] proposed a sampling method to determine the minimum field sampling point when the observation domain was an arbitrary curve by introducing a widely investigated spectrum operator, which can be obtained from evaluating singular values of the radiation/lifting operator. The numerical results showed that the interpolated field matched well with the exact one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the uniform field sampling method, the nonuniform sampling method has a higher source reconstruction accuracy. Furthermore, reference [23] proposed a sampling method to determine the minimum field sampling point when the observation domain was an arbitrary curve by introducing a widely investigated spectrum operator, which can be obtained from evaluating singular values of the radiation/lifting operator. The numerical results showed that the interpolated field matched well with the exact one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%