1993
DOI: 10.1117/12.142181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimension for Alexandrov spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Essentially the same concepts A dimo (p), A dim(G), T dim G (p) and T dim(G) were defined for Alexandroff spaces by Wiederhold and Wilson in [19], where they were called ODIL p, ODIM G, DIL p and DIM G respectively.…”
Section: Three Definitions Of Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Essentially the same concepts A dimo (p), A dim(G), T dim G (p) and T dim(G) were defined for Alexandroff spaces by Wiederhold and Wilson in [19], where they were called ODIL p, ODIM G, DIL p and DIM G respectively.…”
Section: Three Definitions Of Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[] The result that T dim(g) = A dim(g) for all partially ordered sets G is not new--see Proposition 6 in [19].…”
Section: Theorem 3 If G Is Transitive Then a Dim(g) = I Dim(g) And mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then for ind we suggest decomposition, sum and product theorems in the class (Propositions 2.2, 2.3 and 2.5, respectively). Let us note that the product theorem is written as an equality and thus it is stronger than the theorem from [WW1]. The sum and product theorems there we prove even for the small transfinite inductive dimension trind (Propositions 4.3 and 4.4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Remark 2.6. Let us notice that the inequality ind (X × Y) ≤ ind X + ind Y for non-empty Alexandroff T 0 -spaces X, Y was announced in [WW1].…”
Section: Properties Of the Small Inductive Dimension In Alexandroff Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the dimension of a cell is its depth in the "crater" of interlocked neighborhoods. This definition is equivalent to the known notion of the dimension or height of an element of a partially ordered set (poset) as defined in the theory of poset topology [3] and of A-spaces [26].…”
Section: A Relation Between Ssts and Khalimsky Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%