2016
DOI: 10.1109/tasc.2016.2539156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimensional Changes of Nb3Sn Rutherford Cables During Heat Treatment

Abstract: Abstract-In high field magnet applications, Nb3Sn coils undergo a heat treatment step after winding. During this stage, coils expand radially and contract longitudinally due to the Nb3Sn phase change. In order to prevent residual strain from altering superconducting performances, the tooling must provide the adequate space for these dimensional changes. The aim of this study is to understand the behavior of cable dimensions during heat treatment and to provide estimates of the space to be accommodated in the t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tolerance of HQ02 and HQ03 magnets are consistent with earlier TQ quadrupole magnets developed by LARP [23]. They are higher than the positioning tolerance for the LHC NbTi magnets, typically 30 µm, because the size of Nb 3 Sn coils changes during the heat treatment [8], [25]. fabrication for HQ03 gave 10% lower positioning tolerance with respect to HQ02.…”
Section: B Coil Positioning Tolerancesupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The tolerance of HQ02 and HQ03 magnets are consistent with earlier TQ quadrupole magnets developed by LARP [23]. They are higher than the positioning tolerance for the LHC NbTi magnets, typically 30 µm, because the size of Nb 3 Sn coils changes during the heat treatment [8], [25]. fabrication for HQ03 gave 10% lower positioning tolerance with respect to HQ02.…”
Section: B Coil Positioning Tolerancesupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Free simply means that the cable is free to expand without any constraint by tooling or insulation. †Measured expansion from coil cross section analysis [25], [26]. ‡Measured expansion from LBNL cable experiments [27].…”
Section: B Cable Expansionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process is slow but is not subject to scaling uncertainties. A cross section of LARP coil 1 was analyzed with an optical comparator and a cross section of CERN coil 101 was analyzed with image post processing [25], [26].…”
Section: Coil Cross Section Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The angle was reduced from the "first-generation" value of 0.55° to bring the critical current degradation due to cabling to <5% in the PIT conductor and <3% in the RRP conductor. For the coil design and the field quality computation, an increase of width and midthickness of 1.2% and 4.5% respectively was assumed, with the same keystone angle, as observed by dimensional measurements performed on cross-section of first-generation coils [16]. The cable is insulated with braided S2-glass, with a nominal thickness of 145 µm +-5 at a pressure of 5 MPa.…”
Section: Superconducting Strand and Cablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…140 mm long end-shoe extensions at the lead ends of both layers protect the area where the Nb-Ti to Nb3Sn splices are made. For the short model program, 13 first-generation coils have been fabricated, including a coil wound with Cu cable, and 2 practice coils, which were cut to analyze the quality of impregnation and the conductor positions [16]. LARP coil 02 was tested as a single coil in a "mirror magnet" structure and reached 90% of the maximum current limit.…”
Section: Superconducting Strand and Cablementioning
confidence: 99%